South Africa and the Boer-British War, Volume I: Comprising a History of South Africa and its people, including the war of 1899 and 1900Halstead, Murat
History
South Africa and the Boer-British War, Volume I: Comprising a History of South Africa and its people, including the war of 1899 and 1900
Halstead, Murat
South African War, 1899-1902
it was also the symptom of a deplorable state of things. They might
be quite certain that no English gentleman would have engaged
in what might be called a filibustering raid had it not been for the
strong cry of distress that proceeded from within the Transvaal.
But it was unfortunate from many points of view. In the
first place, it gave the Transvaal Government very much the best of
the argument. They had then a great grievance to complain of, and
we in those circumstances could not urge those grievances of which
our subjects had to complain. In the meantime, almost all the
taxation of the country was drawn from our fellow-countrymen--the
very people who were not subjects of the Transvaal. Our
fellow-subjects combined in vain for the most elementary form of
education. They were losing face, so to speak, in the eyes of the
natives and of the world at large. And the most important
element of all was beginning to attract attention--which was that
with the money derived from the gold the Transvaal Government
was gradually piling up a great military power, armed to the teeth.
That was a standing menace to to our dominion. If it had
continued we should have had to consider whether we who rule so
many nations were to become a subject nation in our turn in South
Africa; and had we become a subject nation, or remained even in
the position in which we were, it was scarcely possible to doubt
that we should have lost South Africa itself.
[Sidenote: The Sting of Majuba Hill]
Nothing has happened showing more distinctly than Lord
Rosebery's utterance, the sting that has rankled
in England of the unfortunate campaign that
closed in the surrender at Majuba Hill; and
the history of that event, with the influential circumstances
before and after, has been obscured rather than cleared by the
strenuous spirit of controversy on both sides. Every point is
contested except the defeat of the British. The Boers claim that 120
of their riflemen assailed the British soldiers and made prisoners
of them, though they were 600 strong. The British version is that
they were caught in an untenable position and overwhelming forces,
outnumbering them four to one, were their assailants. There is
bitter feeling in the British Army on the relative responsibilities of
disaster, and the reinforcements sent from England, arriving at Cape
Town soon after the battle were in a desperate state of
dissatisfaction with the peacemaking that followed, and felt themselves
not only aggrieved but insulted.
[Sidenote: The Gordon Highlanders at Majuba Hill]
A despatch from Bombay about
the embarkation to take part in the present Boer and British war
of the Gordon Highlanders, contained the following: "The stern,
grim Highlanders were curiously quiet. Every Englishman who
saw them knew the reason. The Gordons are one of the finest
regiments in the army. They have a splendid fighting record. But
in the last Boer war a strong detachment of the Second Battery
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account