South Africa and the Transvaal War, Vol. 7 (of 8): The Guerilla War, from February 1901 to the Conclusion of HostilitiesCreswicke, Louis
History
South Africa and the Transvaal War, Vol. 7 (of 8): The Guerilla War, from February 1901 to the Conclusion of Hostilities
Creswicke, Louis
South African War, 1899-1902; Transvaal (South Africa) -- History
FROM LORD KITCHENER TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WAR.
PRETORIA, _14th April 1902_, 6.10 P.M.
The High Commissioner and I met the Boer representatives this
morning, when I communicated to them the substance of your
telegram. We then endeavoured to induce them to make fresh
proposals, but President Steyn, who throughout acted as their
leading spokesman, immediately took the line that while the
Boer Governments were competent to make peace they were not
competent to surrender the independence of their country; that
only the people could do this--the people, as explained,
meaning the Burghers still in the field. If he was to suggest
anything involving the abandonment of independence, it would be
a betrayal of their trust.
Schalk Burger and General Botha took precisely the same line.
As no progress could be made the meeting was adjourned by
mutual consent till this afternoon. The Boer representatives
then suggested an armistice in order to consult their people;
but I pointed out, with Lord Milner's full concurrence, that we
had not got nearly far enough in the direction of agreement to
justify such a course. Finally it was agreed that I should send
you the following message, which was read over several times,
and fully agreed to by the representatives, to whom I have
given a copy of it:--
"A difficulty has arisen in getting on with proceedings. The
representatives state that constitutionally they have no power
to discuss terms based on the surrender of independence,
inasmuch as only the Burghers can agree to such a basis;
therefore, if they were to propose, it would put them in a
false position with regard to their people. If, however, his
Majesty's Government would state the terms that, subsequent to
a relinquishment of independence, they would be prepared to
grant, the representatives, after asking for the necessary
explanations, without any expression of approval or
disapproval, would submit such conditions to their people."
THE QUESTION OF INDEPENDENCE.
FROM THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WAR TO LORD KITCHENER.
WAR OFFICE, _April 16, 1902_, 2.20 P.M.
We have received with considerable surprise the message from
the Boer leaders contained in your telegram of April 14.
The meeting was arranged at their request, and they must have
been aware of our repeated declarations that we could not
entertain any proposals based on the renewed independence of
the two South African States. We were, therefore, entitled to
assume that the Boer representatives had relinquished the idea
of independence, and would propose terms of surrender for the
forces still in the field.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account