South Africa and the Transvaal War, Vol. 7 (of 8): The Guerilla War, from February 1901 to the Conclusion of HostilitiesCreswicke, Louis
History
South Africa and the Transvaal War, Vol. 7 (of 8): The Guerilla War, from February 1901 to the Conclusion of Hostilities
Creswicke, Louis
South African War, 1899-1902; Transvaal (South Africa) -- History
On receipt of the news of this engagement General Fetherstonhaugh,
with the columns under Colonels Sir H. Rawlinson, Williams, and
Hickie, hurriedly pushed north from Klerksdorp so as to deal with
Commandant Kemp's barbarians, while General Gilbert Hamilton's force
moved by rail from Greylingstad to Krugersdorp, and General Methuen
marched from the neighbourhood of Zeerust towards Doornkop. But on the
approach of the troops the Boers began flying westward. Subsequently
it was reported that Kemp and Beyers intended to join hands in the
Waterberg district, consequently General Dixon proceeded through
Olifants Nek to block the passes north of Rustenburg, while General
Fetherstonhaugh continued to scour the rugged region west of the
Magaliesberg. Near Roodeval on the 9th of June he caught them, seized
seventeen prisoners, thirty-three waggons and a quantity of
ammunition, and sent the rest scudding northwards. Still scouring the
country he dispersed Boers right and left, and finally returned to
Klerksdorp with Colonels Rawlinson and Hickie, while Colonel Williams
was directed to Krugersdorp to refit. Curiously enough, in the course
of these operations over country which had for some months been
unexplored by the British, Boers in certain regions were discovered
peacefully ploughing and sowing on their farms. They effected to
believe the war had ended in their favour, but made no demur on being
invited to surrender. Reuter's Correspondent gave the following sample
of a conversation which ensued when the Magistrate announced his
intention of administering the oath of allegiance to Burghers of the
conquered territories desirous of taking it.
Does taking the oath render military service against our own people
compulsory?--No; but British subjects are expected to defend their
town in case of attack.
What difference is there between the oath of neutrality and the oath
of allegiance?--The first effaces a man's nationality; the second
renders him a British subject.
Will the oath prejudice any claim against Great Britain?--No.
Will the oath confer the full rights of a British subject?--Yes.
(Here the Boer could study the policy of the British _versus_ that of
the late South African Government. Political equality on the one side,
and long years of apprenticeship as subject of the Republic on the
other!) The next question was:--
Will those taking the oath now have any advantages over those taking
it later?--No.
If a Burgher takes the oath now, and his property outside is destroyed
by the enemy, will he receive any compensation?--Great Britain
repudiates legal liability, but invites claims, which will be brought
before a commission.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account