South Africa -- Description and travel; South Africa -- History -- 1836-1909; South Africa -- History -- To 1836
Then I enquired into this practice, and perhaps expostulated a little.
“What would you have done,” I asked, “if the man had refused to give up
his property?” “Such a thing has never yet occurred to me,” said the
gentleman in authority. “When it does I will tell you.” But again I
remonstrated. “The things were his own, and why should they have been
taken away from him?” The gentleman in authority smiled, but another of
our party remarked that the weapons were illegal, and that the
confiscation of them was decidedly proper. But the knobkirrie on the
mountain side was not illegal, and even the assegai was to be restored
when the man shewed himself at the appointed place. They were not taken
because they were illegal, but as surety for the man’s return. I did not
press the question, but I fear that I was held to have enquired too
curiously on a matter which did not concern me. I thought that it
concerned me much, for it told me plainer than could any spoken
description how a savage race is ruled by white men.
The reader is not to suppose that I think that the assegai and
knobkirrie should not have been taken from the man. On the other hand I
think that my companion knew very well what he was about, and that the
Zulu generally is lucky to have such men in the land. I say again that
we must have resort to such practices, or that we must leave the
country. But I have told the tale because it exemplifies what I say as
to the manner in which savage races are ruled by us. We were all
shocked the other day because an Indian servant was struck by a white
master, and died from the effects of the blow. The man’s death was an
unfortunate accident which probably caused extreme anguish to the
striker, but cannot be said to have increased at all the criminality of
his act. The question is how far a white master is justified in striking
a native servant. The idea of so doing is to us at home abominable;--but
I fear that we must believe that it is too common in India to create
disgust. It is much the same in Zulu-land. Something is done
occasionally which should not be done, but the rule generally is
beneficent.
Of all the towns in South Africa Pieter Maritzburg is the one in which
the native element is the most predominant. It is not only that the
stranger there sees more black men and women in the streets than
elsewhere, but that the black men and women whom he sees are more
noticeable. While I was writing of “The Colony,” as the Cape Colony is
usually called in South Africa, I spoke of Kafirs. Now I am speaking of
Zulus,--a comparatively modern race of savages as I have already said. I
have seen a pedigree of Chaka their king, but his acknowledged ancestors
do not go back far. Chaka became a great man, and the Zulus swallowed
all the remainder of the conquered tribes, and became so dominant that
they have given their name to the natives of this part of the continent.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account