Authors, English -- 19th century -- Biography; Southey, Robert, 1774-1843
From the day of his son’s death Southey began to step down from the
heights of life, with a steadfast foot, and head still held erect. He
recovered cheerfulness, but it was as one who has undergone an amputation
seeks the sunshine. Herbert’s grave anchored him in Keswick. An offer of
2000_l._ a year for a daily article in the _Times_ did not tempt him to
London. His home, his books, his literary work, Skiddaw, Derwentwater,
and Crosthwaite churchyard were too dear. Three years later came the
unlooked-for birth of a second boy; and Cuthbert was loved by his
father; but the love was chastened and controlled of autumnal beauty and
seriousness.
When the war with France had ended, depression of trade was acutely felt
in England; party spirit ran high, and popular passions were dangerously
roused. In the spring of 1817, the Laureate saw to his astonishment
a poem entitled _Wat Tyler_, by Robert Southey, advertised as just
published. He had written this lively dramatic sketch in the full fervour
of Republicanism twenty-three years previously; the manuscript had passed
into other hands, and he had long ceased to think of it. The skulking
rogue and the knavish publisher who now gave it to the world had chosen
their time judiciously; this rebuke to the apostate of the _Quarterly_
would be a sweet morsel for gossip-mongers to roll under the tongue, an
infallible pill to purge melancholy with all true children of progress.
No fewer than sixty thousand copies, it is said, were sold. _Wat Tyler_
suited well with Southey’s nonage; it has a Bright rhetorical fierceness
of humanity. The speech-making radical blacksmith, “still toiling, yet
still poor,” his insulted daughter, her virtuous lover, the communist
priest John Ball, whose amiable theology might be that of Mr. Belsham in
his later days, stand over against the tyrant king, his Archiepiscopal
absolver from oaths, the haughty nobles, and the servile minions of the
law. There was nothing in the poem that could be remembered with shame,
unless it is shameful to be generous and inexperienced at the age of
twenty. But England in 1817 seemed charged with combustibles, and even
so small a spark as this was not to be blown about without a care. The
Prince Regent had been fired at; there were committals for treason;
there were riots in Somersetshire; the swarm of Manchester Blanketeers
announced a march to London; the Habeas Corpus was suspended; before
the year was out, Brandreth and his fellows had been executed at Derby.
Southey applied to the Court of Chancery for an injunction to restrain
the publication of his poem. It was refused by Lord Eldon, on the ground
that the publication being one calculated to do injury to society, the
author could not reclaim his property in it. There the matter might have
dropped; but it seemed good to Mr. William Smith, representing liberal
Norwich, where Southey had many friends, to take his seat in the House
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account