Spears of destiny : $b A story of the first capture of ConstantinopleSmith, Arthur D. Howden (Arthur Douglas Howden)
History
Spears of destiny : $b A story of the first capture of Constantinople
Smith, Arthur D. Howden (Arthur Douglas Howden)
Crusades -- Fourth, 1202-1204 -- Fiction; Istanbul (Turkey) -- History -- Siege, 1203-1204 -- Fiction
The Greeks were frenzied with rage, and the first result of the
catastrophe was to cement them all into one firm bond of hatred for
the Crusaders, to whom they ascribed all their troubles. The
survivors of the Latin colonies, some 15,000 in number, fled across
the Golden Horn and took refuge in the camp of the host. Alexius
hastened his return to the city, urged on by the news which reached
him of the existing situation. He came back apparently more devoted
than ever to the cause of his Western friends, but within a week he
had changed his outlook completely.
Instead of friendship, pleasant words and free promises, the leaders
of the host met with coldness and ill-concealed displeasure when they
visited the Palace. More significant still, it began to be difficult
to secure the provisions needed for the maintenance of so many men.
The money payments dwindled and stopped. The steps taken for raising
a force of 10,000 Greeks to assist the Crusaders against the Saracens
were abruptly rescinded. The negotiations between the Patriarch and
the clergy of the host for the reconciliation of the Greek Church
with Rome were dragged out until they became a dawdling bicker.
Winter was approaching, and the lords of the host understood that
they were facing a new crisis.
So matters stood at the end of November. The barons acted with their
accustomed decision. A parliament was summoned and the situation was
discussed in open assembly, for no modern republic is more
independent and self-governing than was that feudal army. The
cardinal principles of its government were that the leaders could act
only with the consent of the rank and file and that the majority must
always rule. In fact, the expedition was so democratic in character
that it must have fallen apart from lack of cohesion and discipline
had it not been for the outstanding personality of Dandolo. The
barons, who were jealous of one another as equals, were willing to
serve him and take his advice, partly because of his age and
undoubted wisdom, and partly because he was an independent sovereign,
with no feudal position.
It was Dandolo who dominated this parliament at Galata, exactly as he
had dominated other gatherings of the host. He waited until the
other chiefs had spoken. Then, without rising from his seat, he
began:
"Lords, we are again come to a place where two roads divide before
us. If we take one we shall leave here, denouncing the Greeks to the
world as forsworn and take up our voyage at a time when it is
difficult to travel on the sea and when we may not fight in Outremer.
If we take the other, we shall call upon the Greeks to say what they
mean to do, telling them that if they abide by their oaths we will
continue in friendship with them and do all that men may to live in
amity, but that if they do not, then shall we war upon them until
they admit we are masters."
"How should we advantage ourselves thereby?" questioned a knight.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account