Special talents and defects : $b Their significance for educationHollingworth, Leta Stetter
Science
Special talents and defects : $b Their significance for education
Hollingworth, Leta Stetter
Educational psychology; Educational tests and measurements; Exceptional children
It has been suggested that executive ability, in the sense of ability to
deal effectively with human relationships, is specialized; that it is
not closely correlated with IQ. Very few quantitative studies of the
matter have been undertaken, largely because of the lack of means to
gauge objectively “ability to handle people.” It is true that there
exist persons whose ability to deal effectively with human relationships
has stood the test of life—executives in professional bodies, in
business, and in government. These persons have not, however, been
subjected to mental examination. Their time is so valuable that
investigators perhaps hesitate to encroach upon it. Even if this could
be done, we should nevertheless lack proper data for correlational
study. We should also need to know how many persons of an equal degree
of intelligence had _failed_ to succeed as executives. This would be
difficult to discover.
Terman has given us a few facts, from his studies of superior children,
which tend to indicate the relation between leadership and intelligence,
in childhood. According to teachers’ judgments of leadership, children
of over 120 IQ are much oftener leaders than children of less
intelligence are, and they are usually well liked by other children,
even when not designated as leaders. Very few children over 120 IQ are
judged by teachers to be “unpopular.”
From observations of the frequency with which children of high IQ are
leaders of other children, the present writer suspects that there is an
optimum range of IQ, within which popular leadership is extremely
frequent, but above which it is very improbable. The optimum range for
leadership appears to fall between 110 and 130, when the total group has
a median IQ of 100. Children of IQ over 160 seem to have little chance
of leading their fellow children, when the median IQ of the group is
100. Children of IQ over 180 have almost no chance, in the observations
of the present writer, to be popular leaders. Of the four New York
children, previously mentioned in other chapters, measuring over 180 IQ
(Stanford-Binet), only one is an organizer of fellow children, being
designated by her teachers as “the most popular child in the school.”
This child functions as leader of a group of highly selected children,
with a median IQ of near 120. In a group of unselected children she
probably could not achieve leadership, although highly endowed with
physical and temperamental traits which favor leadership.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account