Special talents and defects : $b Their significance for educationHollingworth, Leta Stetter
Science
Special talents and defects : $b Their significance for education
Hollingworth, Leta Stetter
Educational psychology; Educational tests and measurements; Exceptional children
General intelligence is, then, the single most important factor for
school progress. The same may be said of progress in vocational careers.
The life success of a human being may be said to depend upon general
intelligence, character, health, and opportunity (including the factor
of sex). If any of these factors is reduced to zero, so that the
individual is totally lacking in intelligence, character, health, or
opportunity there can be no achievement. The order of importance of the
various factors is probably that in which they have been mentioned, with
general intelligence certainly at the top of the list. Intelligence may
create character, opportunity, and even health, but none of these can
create intelligence.
IV. SPECIAL ABILITIES AND DISABILITIES AS DETERMINANTS OF SCHOOL
PROGRESS
As before stated in these pages, no census has ever been taken of
special aptitudes and defects, in the functions which we have been
discussing, and which are important for progress through the elementary
school. No one can tell whether any have been advanced on the basis of a
special gift. No one can say how many children are retarded, because of
a specialized disability, though we know from reports rendered, that
some pupils become retarded in school status through special failure in
one or two respects.
The children described under the topics of special retardation in
reading and in arithmetic, in this volume, are illustrative of the way
in which specialized defect contributes to retardation in school status.
Without passable mastery of these “tool” subjects a child cannot proceed
through the elementary school. His progress is halted, much as it would
be if he were deficient in general intelligence.
It is quite possible, on the other hand, that children may be
occasionally overrated as to intellect by teachers, who are deceived by
conspicuous talent in a special function. Coy, who studied for two years
a class of highly intelligent children in Columbus, has given an account
of a boy who was thus overrated. When the children were being selected
for the special class described, this boy was sent by his teacher to
join the group. She considered that he must be “very bright,” “since he
could draw cartoons, play the ukelele, and sing.” He was said by the art
teacher to have more ability than any other child in the building. He
was retained in the special class by the investigator, but he was not
able to do good work there. His IQ on three annual testings stood as
114, 119, and 120. (The other children in the group possessed general
intelligence clustering about an IQ of approximately 135.) This boy
surpassed the others in music, acting, and drawing, but “his ability to
reason was far below the class level,” and he could not compete
successfully in general intellectual work. His teachers had been misled
by his special gifts to recommend him as a child of surpassing
intellect.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account