Special talents and defects : $b Their significance for educationHollingworth, Leta Stetter
Science
Special talents and defects : $b Their significance for education
Hollingworth, Leta Stetter
Educational psychology; Educational tests and measurements; Exceptional children
It has been stated that most of the mental functions, which human beings
perform, are not elementary, but are capable of analysis into many
contributing factors. Reading has been shown by such analysis to be a
very complex function, interference in any part of which may result in
disability. The causes of failure to learn to read under instruction,
therefore, differ from child to child. Huey, who spent years studying
the psychology of reading, finally became so imbued with the wonder of
the process, that he felt that to know it in all its aspects and
ramifications would be to know all psychology.
Correlations between IQ and reading ability, among children of the same
age, in both silent and oral reading, are positive and very high. This
is especially true of reading for the understanding of sentences.
Correlation between general intelligence, as measured by a scale like
Stanford-Binet, and reading ability, as measured by a scale like
Trabue’s Language Completion, or Thorndike-McCall’s scale for
understanding of sentences, reaches as high as .90, and hardly ever in
any group falls below .60.
These correlations indicate that general mental maturity is very closely
related to learning to read. The very intelligent children are the best
readers in by far the majority of cases, while school children who do
not learn to read under ordinary instruction, are usually feeble-minded.
On the basis of experimentation in this field, Ranschburg suggests that
even so mechanical an aspect of reading as ability to call correctly
words exposed in a tachistoscope, may serve as a rough means of
separating feeble-minded school children from the others. Nevertheless,
even with correlation coefficients reaching as high as .90, there may
occur occasional cases of very marked discrepancy between general
intelligence and ability to read.
Very early reading, with little or no formal instruction, is often found
among children of very high IQ. Of four children measuring over 180 IQ
(Stanford-Binet), found by the present writer in New York City, every
one learned to read simple matter fluently during or before the third
year of life. Their early mastery of reading was but a symptom of their
great general capacity.
Just what degree of intellectual development is typically reached before
children can be taught to read is not known, but it is probably not far
from a 6-year level. That is, children of ordinary intelligence can
learn to read after they have passed their sixth birthday. A child who
can read fluently at a mental age much below this must be considered to
show a special ability; while one who cannot begin to learn at or above
this general level[10] is afflicted with a special defect, in some of
the functions which enter into the reading process. These functions may
be classified as those which enter into _mechanics_, and those which
enter into _comprehension_, of reading.
II. THE MECHANICS OF READING
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account