Speciation and Evolution of the Pygmy Mice, Genus BaiomysPackard, Robert L. (Robert Lewis)
Science
Speciation and Evolution of the Pygmy Mice, Genus Baiomys
Packard, Robert L. (Robert Lewis)
Mice
An analysis of external and cranial characters of pygmy mice (see Figure
12) reveals that both species are essentially largest to the north and
smallest to the south. There are exceptions to this cline in both
species. For example, _B. taylori analogous_ is a large subspecies; it
lives allopatrically in the southern part of the range of the species.
_B. musculus pallidus_ is not the largest subspecies; it lives
allopatrically in the northern part of the range of the species. In
west-central Mexico, where the two species are sympatric, _B. taylori_
is smaller than elsewhere and _B. musculus_ is larger than elsewhere.
_B. t. analogous_ lives in the mountains of the transverse volcanic zone
in central Mexico. Its large size may be a result of the cooler climate
in the mountains. _B. t. allex_, the smallest subspecies, lives
sympatrically with _B. musculus musculus_ at lower elevations in
west-central Mexico. The small size of _allex_ could be a result of the
warmer climate of the lower elevations. _B. m. pallidus_, at lower
elevations in southern Oaxaca, is smaller than other subspecies of
_musculus_ to the south at higher elevations. _B. m. musculus_ lives at
low elevations along the coast of west-central Mexico. Unlike _B. m.
pallidus_, _B. m. musculus_ is large at lower elevations. It occurs
sympatrically with _B. t. allex_. It is my idea that during the period
of separation, when the two species were evolving, larger subspecies
evolved to the north or at higher altitudes where climates were cooler;
smaller subspecies evolved to the south or at lower elevations; the two
cognate species, _musculus_ and _taylori_, made contact at lower
elevations where individuals of _taylori_ may have been smallest, but
individuals of _musculus_ were not the largest of the species. The
differences, therefore, between the two species in their initial contact
probably were slight. Hybrids, if they occurred, were probably
inviable, sterile, or ill-suited for occupancy of the habitat of either
of the parental stocks. The occurrence of hybrids, therefore, would
result in what geneticists call "gamete wastage," and any further
divergence in the parental stock, either in external characters (size
and shape of body and head), or behavior, useful in recognition of
species, would be favored by natural selection (see Dobzhansky,
1951:225; and Koopman, 1950:147). The two species seem to have diverged
more in external characters where they occur together than in areas
where they live separately (see Figure 12). The two species could be
confused if a sample of adults of _taylori_ from 7 mi. S La Belle,
Jefferson County, Texas, were compared to a sample of adults of
_musculus_ from Tehuantepec, Oaxaca (see Figure 12). No confusion in
species identity would arise, however, if a sample of adults was taken
from the area where the two species live together (see Figure 12). Brown
and Wilson (1956:49) pointed out that where two closely related species
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account