St. Nicholas Vol. XIII, September, 1886, No. 11: An Illustrated Magazine for Young FolksVarious
History
St. Nicholas Vol. XIII, September, 1886, No. 11: An Illustrated Magazine for Young Folks
Various
Children's literature -- Periodicals; Children's periodicals, American
In the hall-way, the old birds could not reach the young to
feed them, but they would fly in and through the house; this
they did for several days, and then, apparently, they abandoned
our locality and their young altogether. As we thought the old
birds would not return, we again placed the cage outside the
house, in its first position, but on one occasion we failed to
entirely cover the cage with the mosquito-bar; and that very
evening, at the usual feeding-time, about dusk, both old birds
were seen, for the first time since their departure. Each bird
had food or poison in its beak, and each was seen feeding it to
the young birds; and then they flew away and did not return.
Not suspecting any danger to the young birds, we allowed the
cage to remain in the same place all night.
Next morning early, we found one young bird dead in the cage,
and the other barely alive, reeling and dazed as if under the
influence of a poisonous weed or narcotic. Within a few hours,
it too was dead. I am sorry that I lost two very beautiful
birds; and I think the parent-birds poisoned the young
captives, as the old birds were not seen by us again. Shall not
the verdict be "guilty" instead of "not guilty"? Decide the
question, Dear Jack.
Yours truly, LOUISE A-----.
No, thank you! You can't persuade me to be the judge in _such_ a case.
For if I should undertake to decide the question of guilt, I'd be sure
to point out the fact that in every instance the poisoned birds were in
cages, not in nests. And then you wise human folk would be sure to
say that that wasn't a fair way of stating the case, or that I was
prejudiced. And perhaps I am. I'm neither a bird nor a human being, you
see; I'm only Jack-in-the-Pulpit. So settle this matter for yourselves.
A LIVING ISLAND.
DEAR JACK: The alligator is not in any way an attractive
animal. On the contrary, it is about as repellant in looks and
disposition as any living creature very well can be. And yet in
one respect, at least, it is to be envied: It can go through
life without ever needing a dentist, unless it be to eat him;
for it never keeps its teeth long enough to give them any
chance to decay or ache or get out of order in any way. When an
alligator's tooth is worn out or broken or in need of any kind
of repair, it drops out, and, behold! a new one is ready to
take its place. But I hardly need say that the alligator's
teeth are a joy only to itself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account