St. Paul's Epistle to the Romans: A Practical Exposition. Vol. IGore, Charles
Religion
St. Paul's Epistle to the Romans: A Practical Exposition. Vol. I
Gore, Charles
Bible. Romans -- Commentaries
[1] Cf. Eccles. viii. 11: 'Because sentence against an evil work is not
executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is emboldened
to do evil.' Ps. x. 11: 'He saith in his heart, God hath forgotten.'
Wisd. xi. 23: 'Thou overlookest the sins of men to the end they may
repent.' Ecclus. v. 4: 'Say not, I sinned, and what happened unto me?
For the Lord is longsuffering.' 2 Pet. iii. 9: 'The Lord is not slack
concerning his promise, as some count slackness; but is longsuffering
to youward, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should
come to repentance.' Cf. also Isa. lvii. 11.
[2] Or rather 'their own conscience bearing witness with them and, in
their mutual relations, their reflections accusing or even excusing
them.'
[3] It is certainly misplaced as it stands (John vii. 53-viii. 11).
[4] Mark xii. 40; Luke xx. 47; Matt. xxiii. 25.
[5] Cf. S. and H. _in loc._
[6] See for Seneca, Lightfoot, _Philippians_, 'St. Paul and Seneca,'
pp. 278-280.
[7] See _Pseudo-Heracleitus_, Letter ix, p. 91 (Bernays).
[8] Acts xvii. 28.
[9] See Rom. i. 32 as well as Rom. ii. 14.
[10] 'Conscience,' as used by St. Paul's contemporaries and by himself,
is not a repository for positive moral guidance, but rather a faculty
for reflecting upon our own already accomplished actions. See further,
app. note B, on the idea of conscience.
[11] See on this subject _Life and Letters of Dr. Hort_ (Macmillan),
vol. ii. p. 337: 'Faith itself, not being an intellectual assent to
propositions, but an attitude of heart and mind, is present in a more
or less rudimentary state in every upward effort or aspiration of man.'
Also Gibson, _Thirty-Nine Articles_ (Methuen), ii. p. 420.
[12] Rom. viii. 4.
[13] Isa. lii. 5.
[14] See in Ezek. xxxvi. 22: 'My holy name, which ye have profaned
among the nations, whither ye went.'
[15] Dr. Gifford suggests that the LXX was subsequently modified by St.
Paul's citation (as in the next chapter, iii. 10-18), instead of his
citation being moulded by the LXX. Is there any evidence in support of
this view?
{114}
DIVISION I. § 3. CHAPTER III. 1-8.
_Jewish objections._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account