St. Paul's Epistle to the Romans: A Practical Exposition. Vol. IIGore, Charles
Religion
St. Paul's Epistle to the Romans: A Practical Exposition. Vol. II
Gore, Charles
Bible. Romans -- Commentaries
4. Here, as in x. 7, St. Paul touches upon the descent into Hades, and
indicates the purpose of it. 'For this end Christ died, that He might
be Lord of the dead.' It might have been imagined that the dim realms
of the dead were outside the jurisdiction of Christ--that the dead have
no king--that the kingdom of redemption does not include them. To
obviate such an idea, to show the universality of His realm, Christ
went down among the dead.
5. In many places of the New Testament there is mention of the
thanksgiving before food--the Christian's 'saying grace.' Whether he
eat flesh or vegetables he 'giveth God thanks[34].' And the word used
is the word which, in its substantive form, is 'eucharist.' And indeed
there is meaning in this. The thankful reception by the Christian of
the ordinary bread of his daily life as coming from God, touched his
common meals with something of the glory of divine communion; and the
eucharist in its turn {158} is the common blessing and breaking of the
bread, raised by the Holy Spirit to a higher power and consecrated to
become the vehicle of the bread of life[35].
[1] Possibly his mind passes by a natural reaction from the thought of
sensual licentiousness (xiii. 13) to that of unenlightened asceticism.
[2] It is implied (xiv. 1; xv. 1 and 7) that the strong-minded brethren
were in the ascendant. It is them chiefly to whom St. Paul addresses
himself.
[3] Ecclus. xxxiii. 9.
[4] Mark vii. 19.
[5] Acts x. 28.
[6] The matter of 'eating with the Gentiles' was prominent, cf. ii. 12.
[7] 1 Cor. x. 25.
[8] Acts xv. 23.
[9] 1 Cor. viii, and x. 23-33.
[10] The exact point--abstaining from all flesh meat--is so different
from what had presented itself at Corinth that there must be a
particular reference to Roman circumstances, of which St. Paul was
probably informed by Priscilla and Aquila.
[11] This seems to follow from Philo's statement that they did not make
animal sacrifices: and from Josephus' description of their way of life
as Pythagorean.
[12] Cf. 1 Cor. viii. 10.
[13] Gal. iv. 10; cf. Col. ii. 16, 17: 'Let no man therefore judge you
in meat, or in drink, or in respect of a feast day or a new moon or a
sabbath day: which are a shadow of the things to come; but the body is
Christ's.'
[14] Or _for decisions of doubts_, marg. This, or something like this,
is the right meaning; cf. Hebr. v. 14: 'for decision between good and
evil.' 1 Cor. xii. 10: 'discernings of spirits,' i.e. decisions as to
their true character.
[15] From Isa. xlv. 33.
[16] Cf. Ephes. pp. 271 f.
[17] See app. note H, p. 239.
[18] Gal. i. 8.
[19] 1 Cor. xv. 12, 13.
[20] 1 Cor. v. 6
[21] Cf. Ephes. p. 126.
[22] 1 Cor. xi. 16.
[23] Gal. v. 2.
[24] Phil. iii. 15, 16.
[25] _Unity in Diversity_, by Charles Bigg, D.D. (Longmans, 1899), pp.
84, 85, 95.
[26] 'Whatever is not of faith is sin--that is whatever is against
conscience.' Aquinas, quoted in _S. and H. in loc._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account