Staffordshire pottery and its historyWedgwood, Josiah C. (Josiah Clement)
History
Staffordshire pottery and its history
Wedgwood, Josiah C. (Josiah Clement)
Potters -- England; Staffordshire pottery; Wedgwood ware
A development, however, that helped the union at first more than anything
else, was the invention of pot-making machines. The potting industry had
survived so long without machinery, that the workmen had begun to think
themselves safe. These flat and hollow ware-pressers had skill, and they
were paid by the piece. At one fell swoop, and in the middle of their
settled lives, they saw themselves suddenly deprived of all the value
of their skill and training, and likely to be replaced by women and
lads. During 1845-6 Mr Ridgway tried a “paste-box” machine, and Chas.
J. Mason bought some sort of a plate “jolly.”[186] The men promptly
struck and prevented their adoption, but the panic was intensified when
Messrs Copeland introduced a similar dread machine, which the potters in
their terror called the “Scourge.” This machine too was withdrawn, but
not because of the union. The general election of 1847 was approaching
and Alderman Copeland stood for Stoke-on-Trent. It is curious to think
that the panic fear of the workers postponed the introduction of these
machines for twenty years. And indeed the pottery workers themselves
have lost something through the introduction of machinery. The proportion
of women and young persons employed in the industry is double what it was
in 1850, and the work of married women is not good for the rest of the
people.
Incidentally this machinery panic broke down the union. Encouraged by
William Evans, their leader and the editor of the “Examiner,” the union
attempted to emigrate the unemployed—almost to emigrate _en masse_ and
fly from the wrath to come. They bought a great estate in Wisconsin,
called it Pottersville, and to it in 1846 they sent out settlers as to
a new Utopia. The scheme failed, and with it, in 1849, collapsed the
third potters’ union. Drained of money for America, it had been growing
weaker ever since 1847—they could only humbly petition against Copeland’s
“Scourge,” and as the union weakened “allowances” crept back into use,
while “good-from-oven” and the annual hiring flourished as before.[187]
It is said that but for the opposition of the Newcastle innkeepers the
main line of the London and Manchester Railway would have run up the
Trent valley, and Newcastle would now occupy the position of Crewe as a
universal junction. However that may be, in 1846 a company was formed for
giving the potteries direct railway communication with the main trunk
lines. The moving spirit in this enterprise was Alderman Copeland, M.P.
for Stoke, and senior partner in Messrs Copeland and Garrett—the pottery
firm that had once been Spode’s.
[Illustration: ALD. W. T. COPELAND, M.P.
1797-1868]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account