State of the Union AddressesHayes, Rutherford Birchard
History
State of the Union Addresses
Hayes, Rutherford Birchard
Presidents -- United States -- Messages; United States -- Politics and government -- Sources
The appropriation for judicial expenses, which has heretofore been made for
the Department of Justice in gross, was subdivided at the last session of
Congress, and no appropriation whatever was made for the payment of the
fees of marshals and their deputies, either in the service of process or
for the discharge of other duties; and since June 30 these officers have
continued the performance of their duties without compensation from the
Government, taking upon themselves the necessary incidental outlays, as
well as rendering their own services. In only a few unavoidable instances
has the proper execution of the process of the United States failed by
reason of the absence of the requisite appropriation. This course of
official conduct on the part of these officers, highly creditable to their
fidelity, was advised by the Attorney-General, who informed them, however,
that they would necessarily have to rely for their compensation upon the
prospect of future legislation by Congress. I therefore especially
recommend that immediate appropriation be made by Congress for this
purpose.
The act making the principal appropriation for the Department of Justice at
previous sessions has uniformly contained the following clause: And for
defraying the expenses which my be incurred in the enforcement of the act
approved February 28, 1871, entitled "An act to amend an act approved May
31, 1870, entitled 'An act to enforce the rights of citizens of the United
States to vote in the several States of this Union, and for other
purposes,'" or any acts amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto. No
appropriation was made for this purpose for the current year. As no general
election for Members of Congress occurred, the omission was a matter of
little practical importance. Such election will, however, take place during
the ensuing year, and the appropriation made for the pay of marshals and
deputies should be sufficient to embrace compensation for the services they
may be required to perform at such elections.
The business of the Supreme Court is at present largely in arrears. It can
not be expected that more causes can be decided than are now disposed of in
its annual session, or that by any assiduity the distinguished magistrates
who compose the court can accomplish more than is now done. In the courts
of many of the circuits also the business has increased to such an extent
that the delay of justice will call the attention of Congress to an
appropriate remedy. It is believed that all is done in each circuit which
can fairly be expected from its judicial force. The evils arising from
delay are less heavily felt by the United States than by private suitors,
as its causes are advanced by the courts when it is seen that they involve
the discussion of questions of a public character.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account