State of the Union AddressesHayes, Rutherford Birchard
History
State of the Union Addresses
Hayes, Rutherford Birchard
Presidents -- United States -- Messages; United States -- Politics and government -- Sources
The most serious obstacle, however, to an improvement of the civil service,
and especially to a reform in the method of appointment and removal, has
been found to be the practice, under what is known as the spoils system, by
which the appointing power has been so largely encroached upon by members
of Congress. The first step in the reform of the civil service must be a
complete divorce between Congress and the Executive in the matter of
appointments. The corrupting doctrine that "to the victors belong the
spoils" is inseparable from Congressional patronage as the established rule
and practice of parties in power. It comes to be understood by applicants
for office and by the people generally that Representatives and Senators
are entitled to disburse the patronage of their respective districts and
States. It is not necessary to recite at length the evils resulting from
this invasion of the Executive functions. The true principles of Government
on the subject of appointments to office, as stated in the national
conventions of the leading parties of the country, have again and again
been approved by the American people, and have not been called in question
in any quarter. These authentic expressions of public opinion upon this
all-important subject are the statement of principles that belong to the
constitutional structure of the Government. Under the Constitution the
President and heads of Departments are to make nominations for office. The
Senate is to advise and consent to appointments, and the House of
Representatives is to accuse and prosecute faithless officers. The best
interest of the public service demands that these distinctions be
respected; that Senators and Representatives, who may be judges and
accusers, should not dictate appointments to office. To this end the
cooperation of the legislative department of the Government is required
alike by the necessities of the case and by public opinion. Members of
Congress will not be relieved from the demands made upon them with
reference to appointments to office until by legislative enactment the
pernicious practice is condemned and forbidden.
It is therefore recommended that an act be passed defining the relations of
members of Congress with respect to appointment to office by the President;
and I also recommend that the provisions of section 1767 and of the
sections following of the Revised Statutes, comprising the tenure-of-office
act of March 2, 1867, be repealed.
Believing that to reform the system and methods of the civil service in our
country is one of the highest and most imperative duties of statesmanship,
and that it can be permanently done only by the cooperation of the
legislative and executive departments of the Government, I again commend
the whole subject to your considerate attention.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account