State Trials, Political and Social. Volume 2 (of 2)
History
State Trials, Political and Social. Volume 2 (of 2)
Trials -- Great Britain
COWPER--It was read against me in the King's Bench, and I will
prove it; was not Mr. Mead with you at the time of your
examination?
PILKINGTON--Yes.
COWPER--Did he not put in some words, and what were they?
PILKINGTON--Not that I know of.
COWPER--But you never swore so, upon your oath?
PILKINGTON--No, I do not believe I did; if I did it was
ignorantly.
JONES--Here is her examination, it is 'cross her neck.'
_Mr. Coatsworth_, a surgeon, was called and deposed that in April he had
been sent for, by Dr. Phillips, to come to Hertford to see the body of
Mrs. Stout, who had been six weeks buried. Various parts of the body
were examined; the woman had not been with child; the intestines and
stomach were full of air, but there was no water in them, or the breast,
or lobes of the lungs; there was no water in the diaphragm.
Then I remember I said, this woman could not be drowned, for if
she had taken in water, the water must have rotted all the
guts; that was the construction I made of it then; but for any
marks about the head or neck, it was impossible for us to
discover it, because they were so rotten.
The inspection was made on the 28th of April, and the woman was drowned
on the 13th of March. The doctor had offered to examine the skull, to
see if it had been injured, 'but they did not suspect a broken skull in
the case, and we did not examine it.' All the other parts were sound.
JONES--Call John Dimsdale.
COWPER--My lord, I would know, and I desire to be heard to this
point; I think where the Coroner's inquest have viewed the
body, and the relations have been heard, and the body buried,
that it is not to be stirred afterwards for any private
inspection of parties, that intend to make themselves
prosecutors; but if it is to be taken up, it is to be done by
some legal authority; for if it should be otherwise, any
gentleman may be easily trepanned: for instance, if they should
have thought fit, after the Coroner's view, to have broken the
skull into a hundred pieces, this was a private view altogether
among themselves. Certainly, if they intended to have
prosecuted me, or any other gentleman upon this evidence, they
ought to have given us notice, that we might have had some
surgeons among them, to superintend their proceedings. My lord,
with submission, this ought not to be given in evidence.
HATSELL, BARON--Mr. Cowper, I think you are not in earnest;
there is no colour for this objection: if they did take up the
body without notice, why should not that be evidence? unless
you think they had a design to forswear themselves.
COWPER--Had you a _Melius Inquirendum_, or any lawful warrant
for making this inspection?
COATSWORTH--No, there was not.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account