Steam, Its Generation and UseBabcock & Wilcox Company
History
Steam, Its Generation and Use
Babcock & Wilcox Company
Steam-boilers, Water-tube
RESULTS OF "IDALIA" TESTS
_______________________________________________________________________
| | | | | | |
|Date 1909 |Oct. 11|Oct. 14|Oct. 14|Oct. 12|Oct. 13|
|_______________________________|_______|_______|_______|_______|_______|
|Degrees of superheat Fahrenheit| 0 | 57 | 88 | 96 | 105 |
|Pressures, pounds per} Throttle| 190 | 196 | 201 | 198 | 203 |
|square inch above } First | | | | | |
|Atmospheric Pressure } Receiver| 68.4 | 66.0 | 64.3 | 61.9 | 63.0 |
| } Second | | | | | |
| } Receiver| 9.7 | 9.2 | 8.7 | 7.8 | 8.4 |
|Vacuum, inches | 25.5 | 25.9 | 25.9 | 25.4 | 25.2 |
|Temperature, Degrees Fahrenheit| | | | | |
| } Feed | 201 | 206 | 205 | 202 | 200 |
| } Hot Well | 116 | 109.5 | 115 | 111.5 | 111 |
| | | | | | |
|Revolutions per minute | | | | | |
| {Air Pump | 57 | 56 | 53 | 54 | 45 |
| {Circulating Pump| 196 | 198 | 196 | 198 | 197 |
| {Main Engine | 194.3 | 191.5 | 195.1 | 191.5 | 193.1 |
|Indicated Horse Power, | | | | | |
| Main Engine | 512.3 | 495.2 | 521.1 | 498.3 | 502.2 |
|Water per hour, total pounds |9397 |8430 |8234 |7902 |7790 |
|Water per indicated | | | | | |
| Horse Power, pounds | 18.3 | 17.0 | 15.8 | 15.8 | 15.5 |
|B. t. u. per minute per | | | | | |
| indicated Horse Power | 314 | 300 | 284 | 286 | 283 |
|Per cent Saving of Steam | ... | 7.1 | 13.7 | 13.7 | 15.3 |
|Percent Saving of Fuel | | | | | |
| (computed) | ... | 4.4 | 9.5 | 8.9 | 9.9 |
|_______________________________|_______|_______|_______|_______|_______|
The table shows that the saving in steam consumption with 105 degrees of
superheat was 15.3 per cent and in heat consumption about 10 per cent.
This may be safely stated to be a conservative representation of the
saving that may be accomplished by the use of superheated steam in a
plant as a whole, where superheated steam is furnished not only to the
main engine but also to the auxiliaries. The figures may be taken as
conservative for the reason that in addition to the saving as shown in
the table, there would be in an ordinary plant a saving much greater
than is generally realized in the drips, where the loss with saturated
steam is greatly in excess of that with superheated steam.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account