Greece -- History -- Peloponnesian War, 431-404 B.C. -- Fiction
Soon after the battle Nicias shifted his winter quarters to Naxos, and
learning this the Syracusans marched in full force to Catana, laid
waste the territory, and burnt the deserted huts of the Athenians. The
insult was tamely endured, and shortly afterwards the ever-active
Hermocrates had an opportunity of thwarting the Athenian intrigues
among the Greek cities of Sicily. The scene of this diplomatic
encounter was Camarina, a Dorian city which had hitherto wavered
between its hatred of Syracuse and its fear of Athens. Early in the
winter Athenian envoys appeared at Camarina with overtures of alliance,
and Hermocrates was sent to represent the interests of Syracuse.
Speaking first in the debate, Hermocrates set himself to unmask the
designs of the Athenians, who, under the thin pretence of helping the
Ionic cities of Sicily, had come (he said) to make a conquest of the
whole island. The Ionians of Greece had long groaned under their yoke,
and the same fate was in store for the Ionians of Sicily, if they
allowed themselves to be beguiled by specious lies. The plea of
friendship and goodwill might pass with the degenerate Greeks of Asia
and the Aegaean, born to be cajoled and enslaved; but the Camariaeans
were of the stout Dorian race, the hereditary foes of tyranny, too wise
and too brave to lend themselves as tools to a bare-faced scheme of
aggression. If not, let them beware: Syracuse was fighting in a
righteous cause, and must prevail in the end; help was coming from
Peloponnesus, and if the Camariaeans stood aloof, the day would come
when they would regret their disloyalty.
There can be no doubt that Hermocrates was right in his view of the
motive which brought the Athenians to Sicily, and the arguments of
Euphemus, the advocate for Athens, who strove to confute him, will not
bear examination. But the people of Camarina were in a difficult
position; their city had suffered many things in the past at the hands
of Syracuse, and they had reason to fear that her oppressions might be
renewed, if she emerged triumphant from the present struggle. On the
other hand, if the Athenians were victorious, they might forfeit their
independence altogether. In this dilemma they determined to play a
waiting game, and when the time came for action, to throw their weight
on the winning side. For the present they answered that they chose to
remain neutral.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account