occasion to glance at so painful a subject, I shall always call him “that
other creature.” Let us hope, however, that no such distressing occasion
will arise. But, by the way, an occasion arises at this moment; for the
Reader will be sure to ask, when we come to the story, “Was this other
creature present?” He was _not_; or more correctly, perhaps, _it_ was
not. We dropped the creature—or the creature, by natural imbecility,
dropped itself—within the first ten miles from Manchester. In the latter
case, I wish to make a philosophic remark of a moral tendency. When I
die, or when the reader dies, and by repute suppose of fever, it will
never be known whether we died in reality of the fever or of the doctor.
But this other creature, in the case of dropping out of the coach, will
enjoy a coroner’s inquest; consequently he will enjoy an epitaph. For
I insist upon it, that the verdict of a coroner’s jury makes the best
of epitaphs. It is brief, so that the public all find time to read; it
is pithy, so that the surviving friends (if any _can_ survive such a
loss) remember it without fatigue; it is upon oath, so that rascals and
Dr. Johnsons cannot pick holes in it. “Died through the visitation of
intense stupidity, by impinging on a moonlight night against the off-hind
wheel of the Glasgow mail! Deodand upon the said wheel—twopence.” What a
simple lapidary inscription! Nobody much in the wrong but an off-wheel;
and with few acquaintances; and if it were but rendered into choice
Latin, though there would be a little bother in finding a Ciceronian
word for “off-wheel,” Marcellus himself, that great master of sepulchral
eloquence, could not show a better. Why I call this little remark _moral_
is, from the compensation it points out. Here, by the supposition, is
that other creature on the one side, the beast of the world; and he
(or it) gets an epitaph. You and I, on the contrary, the pride of our
friends, get none.
But why linger on the subject of vermin? Having mounted the box, I took
a small quantity of laudanum, having already travelled two hundred
and fifty miles,—namely, from a point seventy miles beyond London,
upon a simple breakfast. In the taking of laudanum there was nothing
extraordinary. But by accident it drew upon me the special attention of
my assessor on the box, the coachman. And in _that_ there was nothing
extraordinary. But by accident, and with great delight, it drew my
attention to the fact that this coachman was a monster in point of size,
and that he had but one eye. In fact, he had been foretold by Virgil as—
“Monstrum horrendum, informe, ingens cui lumen ademptum.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account