The mental examination and physicians' notes made during his second
admission showed no gross psychotic symptoms. The patient still
maintained that he actually committed this crime in Rochester, and
related it in great detail. He stated that when he was confined in
Portsmouth Prison he became remorseful over this crime and decided to
confess. His conduct during his second sojourn here was exemplary. He
appeared at conference on April 20, 1914, and a diagnosis of
psychopathic character was made. The opinion was expressed that it was
extremely difficult to pick out the truth from the abnormal elements
in the patient's story, and that there were a great many things in the
general emotional reaction of the patient that fitted into the story.
It was believed that the patient had a sort of determination to get
into difficulties for the sake of posing as a martyr and all that fits
in with the grandiose element of his character. Being oppressed, he is
taking it in a way that is very satisfying to his feelings of
importance. Later during his sojourn here the patient became rather
anxious to be returned to the penitentiary, stating that he had given
up all the ideas which he had expressed on admission, and assured the
physician that he was malingering on both occasions of his transfer to
the hospital. He stated that his chief anxiety which led him to
malinger was that he might be given additional sentences for his
inability to get along in the penitentiary, and he thought the only
way to avoid this would be to be pronounced insane. Patient was
discharged from here to be returned to the penitentiary on July 9,
1914.
The patient was readmitted to this hospital on November 13, 1914, on a
medical certificate which states: Diagnosis--Constitutional
psychopathic state, not in line of duty, existed prior to enlistment.
He was in the Government Hospital for the Insane in Washington for
about four months this year. His condition is not improving. A sudden
outburst occurred two days ago and he has been under close confinement
since. He struck a recruit and after confinement in a cell destroyed a
chair and had to be restrained. His retention in the prison in these
barracks is not deemed desirable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account