It is not easy to deny that there is a world of ideas or of
meanings, which simply consists in that identical reference of
symbols by which mutual understanding between rational beings is
made possible. A _mere_ suggestion, a _mere_ question, a _mere_
negation, seem all of them to imply that we sometimes _entertain_
ideas without affirming them of reality, and therefore without
affirming their reference to be a reference to something real or
their meaning to be fact. We may be puzzled indeed to say what an
idea can mean, or to what it can refer, if it does not mean or
refer to something real--to some element in the fabric
continuously sustained by the judgment which is our consciousness.
On the other hand, it would be shirking a difficulty to neglect
the consideration that an idea, while denied of reality, may
nevertheless, or even must, possess an identical and so
intelligible reference--a symbolic value--for the rational beings
who deny it. A reference, it may be argued, must be a reference to
something. But it seems as if in this case the something were the
fact of reference itself, the rational convention between
intelligent beings, or rather the world which has existence,
whether for one rational being or for many, merely as contained in
and sustained by such intellectual reference.
I only adduce these considerations in order to explain that
transitional conception of an objective world or world of
meanings, distinct from the real world or world of facts, with
which it is impossible wholly to dispense in an account of thought
starting from the individual subject. The paradox is that the real
world or world of fact thus seems for us to fall within and be
included in the objective world or world of meanings, as if all
that is fact were meaning, but not every meaning were fact. This
results in the contradiction that something is objective, which is
not real. (Pp. 4, 5.)
In the seventh section of the introduction Bosanquet explains his
meaning further by what the reader is privileged to regard as a flight
of the imagination--a mere simile--which he thinks may, nevertheless,
make the matter clearer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account