M.O. believes that no moral stigma should be attached to homosexuality until it can be proved to result from the vicious life of a free moral agent,--and of this he has no expectation. He believes that much of its danger and unhappiness would be prevented by a thorough yet discreet sex-education, such as should be given to all children, whether normal or abnormal. FOOTNOTES: [124] Thus Godard described the little boys in Cairo as amusing themselves indifferently either with boys or girls in sexual play. (_Egypte et Palestine_, 1867, p. 105.) The same thing may be observed in England and elsewhere. [125] Thus, of the Duc d'Orleans, in the seventeenth century, as described in Bouchard's _Confessions_, one of my correspondents writes: "This prince was of the same mind as Campanella, who, in the _Città del Sole_, laid it down that young men ought to be freely admitted to women for the avoidance of sexual aberrations. Aretino and Berni enable us to comprehend the sexual immorality of males congregated together in the courts of Roman prelates." The homosexuality of youth was also well recognized among the Romans, but they adopted the contrary course and provided means to gratify it, as the existence of the _concubinus_, referred to by Catullus, clearly shows. [126] "Our Public Schools: their Methods and Morals." _New Review_, July, 1893. [127] Max Dessoir, "Zür Psychologie der Vita Sexualis," _Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie_, 1894, H. 5. [128] F.H.A. Marshall, _The Physiology of Reproduction_, 1910, pp. 650-8. [129] Iwan Bloch, in _The Sexual Life of Our Time_, makes this distinction as between "homosexuality" (corresponding to inversion) and "pseudo-homosexuality." According to the terminology I have accepted, the term "pseudo-homosexuality" would be unnecessary and incorrect. More recently (_Die Prostitution_, Bd. i, 1912, p. 103) Bloch has preferred, in place of pseudo-homosexuality, the more satisfactory term, "secondary homosexuality." [130] See, for instance, Hirschfeld's reasonable discussion of the matter, _Die Homosexualität_, ch. xvii. [131] Alfred Fuchs, who edited Krafft-Ebing's _Psychopathia Sexualis_ after the latter's death, distinguishes between congenital homosexuality, manifesting itself from the first without external stimulation, and homosexuality on a basis of inborn disposition needing special external influences to arouse it (_Jahrbuch für sexuelle Zwischenstufen_, Bd. iv, 1902, p. 181).