Studies in the Psychology of Sex, Volume 3: Analysis of the Sexual Impulse; Love and Pain; The Sexual Impulse in WomenEllis, Havelock
Science
Studies in the Psychology of Sex, Volume 3: Analysis of the Sexual Impulse; Love and Pain; The Sexual Impulse in Women
Ellis, Havelock
Sex; Sex (Psychology)
Humanism and the spread of the Renaissance movement brought in a
spirit more sympathetic to women. Soon after, especially in Italy
and France, we begin to find attempts at analyzing the sexual
emotions, which are not always without a certain subtlety. In the
seventeenth century a book of this kind was written by Venette.
In matters of love, Venette declared, "men are but children
compared to women. In these matters women have a more lively
imagination, and they usually have more leisure to think of love.
Women are much more lascivious and amorous than men." This is the
conclusion reached in a chapter devoted to the question whether
men or women are the more amorous. In a subsequent chapter,
dealing with the question whether men or women receive more
pleasure from the sexual embrace, Venette concludes, after
admitting the great difficulty of the question, that man's
pleasure is greater, but woman's lasts longer. (N. Venette, _De
la Génération de l'Homme ou Tableau de l'Amour Conjugal_,
Amsterdam, 1688.)
At a much earlier date, however, Montaigne had discussed this
matter with his usual wisdom, and, while pointing out that men
have imposed their own rule of life on women and their own
ideals, and have demanded from them opposite and contradictory
virtues,--a statement not yet antiquated,--he argues that women
are incomparably more apt and more ardent in love than men are,
and that in this matter they always know far more than men can
teach them, for "it is a discipline that is born in their veins."
(Montaigne, _Essais_, book iii, chapter v.)
The old physiologists generally mentioned the appearance of
sexual desire in girls as one of the normal signs of puberty.
This may be seen in the numerous quotations brought together by
Schurig, in his _Parthenologia_, cap. ii.
A long succession of distinguished physicians throughout the
seventeenth century discussed at more or less length the relative
amount of sexual desire in men and women, and the relative degree
of their pleasure in coitus. It is remarkable that, although they
usually attach great weight to the supposed opinion of
Hippocrates in the opposite sense, most of them decide that both
desire and pleasure are greater in women.
Plazzonus decides that women have more sources of pleasure in
coitus than men because of the larger extent of surface excited;
and if it were not so, he adds, women would not be induced to
incur the pains and risks of pregnancy and childbirth.
(Plazzonus, _De Partibus Generationi Inservientibus_, 1621, lib.
ii, cap. xiii.)
"Without doubt," says Ferrand, "woman is more passionate than
man, and more often torn by the evils of love." (Ferrand, _De la
Maladie d'Amour_, 1623, chapter ii.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account