Studies in the Scriptures, Volume 7: The Finished MysteryRussell, C. T. (Charles Taze)
Religion
Studies in the Scriptures, Volume 7: The Finished Mystery
Russell, C. T. (Charles Taze)
Bible -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jehovah's witnesses -- Controversial literature
By the means of those miracles.—Signs, the laying on of hands, doctrines
of immortality, trinity and claims that none are qualified to understand
the Bible aright except those consecrated by the imposition of holy orders
by the episcopal succession.—Z. ’80‐1‐2.
Which he had power to do in the sight of the beast.—While the papacy is
still alive and active.—Rev. 19:20.
Saying.—By its own example.
To them that dwell on the earth.—Independent Christians.
That they should ALSO make an Image to the beast.—“From the year 1800 to
1846 was a time in which great numbers of new sects arose, whereas before
that, they were few and prominent. This gave rise to uneasiness among the
older denominations who wondered whereunto this thing would lead. As the
Bible came to be read more and more by the masses, occasional individuals
would feel free to preach what they thought it taught, regardless of
denominational creeds and the views of the older sects. As a consequence,
Protestants were fast splitting up into fragments. They began to say, By
what means shall we check and stop this disposition to individual thought
and opinion relative to the teachings of Scripture? They wanted to stop
the very thing God desired; viz., that each individual should be free and
independent of restraint, with his faith based, not on the views of
others, not on the decisions of Councils or Presbyters, nor in the
decision of the Pope, nor in things approved of the head of the English
church, but in the Word of God. The question came: How can we restrain
these preachers? This was a quandary to all except the Roman and Episcopal
churches, since these both claimed the ‘Apostolic Succession,’ and that
this, by ordination, conferred upon their ministers special power and
authority to preach and to administer the ‘Sacraments’; hence that no
others had a right to do so, but were clerical pretenders. Other
denominations could not claim this continuation of apostolic power through
their preachers, but simply set them apart by prayer, consequently those
of one denomination could not object that the preachers of other
denominations, as well as all laymen, were not as truly authorized of God
to expound the Scriptures as their own clergy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account