Studies in the South and West, with Comments on CanadaWarner, Charles Dudley
History
Studies in the South and West, with Comments on Canada
Warner, Charles Dudley
Canada -- Description and travel; United States -- Description and travel
Our host, an old man over six feet in height, with spare, straight,
athletic form, a fine head, and large clear gray eyes, lived here alone
with his aged spouse. He had done his duty by his country in raising
twelve children (that is the common and orthodox number in this region),
who had all left him except one son, who lived in a shanty up the
ravine. It was this son’s wife who helped about the house and did the
milking, taking care also of a growing family of her own, and doing her
share of field-work. I had heard that the women in this country were
more industrious than the men. I asked this woman, as she was milking
that evening, if the women did all the work. No, she said; only their
share. Her husband was all the time in the field, and even her boys, one
only eight, had to work with him; there was no time to go to school, and
indeed the school didn’t amount to much anyway—only a little while in
the fall. She had all the care of the cows. “Men,” she added, “never
notice milking;” and the worst of it was that she had to go miles around
in the bush night and morning to find them. After supper we had a call
from a bachelor who occupied a cabin over the pass, on the Kentucky
side, a loquacious philosopher, who squatted on his heels in the
door-yard where we were sitting, and interrogated each of us in turn as
to our names, occupations, residence, ages, and politics, and then gave
us as freely his own history and views of life. His eccentricity in this
mountain region was that he had voted for Cleveland and should do it
again. Mr. Morris couldn’t go with him in this; and when pressed for his
reasons he said that Cleveland had had the salary long enough, and got
rich enough out of it. The philosopher brought the news, had heard it
talked about on Sunday, that a man over Clover Fork way had killed his
wife and brother. It was claimed to be an accident; they were having
a game of cards and some whiskey, and he was trying to kill his
son-in-law. Was there much killing round here? Well, not much lately.
Last year John Cone, over on Clover Fork, shot Mat Harner in a dispute
over cards. Well, what became of John Cone? Oh, he was killed by Jim
Blood, a friend of Harner. And what became of Blood? Well, he got shot
by Elias Travers. And Travers? Oh, he was killed by a man by the name
of Jacobs. That ended it. None of ‘em was of much account. There was a
pleasing naivete in this narrative. And then the philosopher, whom the
milkmaid described to me next morning as “a simlar sort of man,” went on
to give his idea about this killing business. “All this killing in the
mountains is foolish. If you kill a man, that don’t aggravate him; he’s
dead and don’t care, and it all comes on you.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account