Studies in the South and West, with Comments on CanadaWarner, Charles Dudley
History
Studies in the South and West, with Comments on Canada
Warner, Charles Dudley
Canada -- Description and travel; United States -- Description and travel
Another cause of friction, aggravated by the power of disallowance, has
arisen from conflict in jurisdiction as to railways. Both the Dominion
and the provinces may charter and build railways. But the British Act
forbids the province to legislate as to lines of steam or other ships,
railways, canals, and telegraphs connecting the province with any other
province, or extending beyond its limits, or any such work actually
within the limits which the Canadian Parliament may declare for the
general advantage of Canada; that is, declare it to be a Dominion work.
A promoter, therefore, cannot tell with any certainty what a charter is
worth, or who will have jurisdiction over it. The trouble in Manitoba
in the fall of 1888 between the province and the Canadian Pacific road
(which is a Dominion road in the meaning of the Act) could scarcely
have arisen if the definition of Dominion and provincial rights had been
clearer.
But a more serious cause of weakness to the provinces and embarrassment
to the Dominion is in the provincial subsidies. When the present
confederation was formed the Dominion took on the provincial debts up
to a certain amount. It also agreed to pay annually to each province, in
half-yearly payments, a subsidy. By the British Act this annual payment
was $80,000 to Ontario, $70,000 to Quebec, $60,000 to Nova Scotia,
$50,000 to New Brunswick, with something additional to the last two. In
1886-87 the subsidies paid to all the provinces amounted to $4,169,341.
This is as if the United States should undertake to raise a fixed
revenue to distribute among the States—a proceeding alien to our ideas
of the true function of the General Government, and certain to lead to
State demoralization, and tending directly to undermine its self-support
and dignity. It is an idea quite foreign to the conception of political
economy that it is best for people to earn what they spend, and only
spend what they earn. This subsidy under the Act was a grant equal to
eighty cents a head of the population. Besides this there is given
to each province an annual allowance for government; also an annual
allowance of interest on the amount of debt allowed where the province
has not reached the limit of the authorized debt. It is the theory of
the Federal Government that in taking on these pecuniary burdens of the
provinces they will individually feel them less, and that if money is to
be raised the Dominion can procure it on more favorable terms than the
provinces. The system, nevertheless, seems vicious to our apprehension,
for nothing is clearer to us than that neither the State nor the general
welfare would be promoted if the States were pensioners of the General
Government.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account