In spite, however, of these and other complicating circumstances I
believe that the instinct to adorn the person is observable in children.
They like a bit of finery in the shape of a string of beads or of
daisies for the neck, a feather for the hat, a scrap of brilliantly
coloured ribbon or cloth as a bow for the dress, and so forth.
Imitation, doubtless, plays a part here, but it is, I think, possible to
allow for this, and still to detect points of contact with the savage’s
love of finery. Perhaps, indeed, we may discern the play of both the
impulses underlying personal ornament which were referred to above,
_viz._, the alluring and alarming. Allowing for the differences of
intelligence, of sexual development and so forth, we may say that
children betray a rudiment of the instinct to win admiration by
decorating the person, and also of the instinct to overawe. A small
boy’s delight in adding to his height and formidable appearance by
donning his father’s tall hat is pretty certainly an illustration of
this last.
This is not the place to inquire whether the love of finery in
children—a very variable trait, as M. Perez and others have shown—is
wholly the outcome of vanity. I would, however, just remark that a child
lost in the vision of himself reflected in a mirror decked out in new
apparel may be very far from feeling vanity as we understand the word.
The pure child-wonder at what is new and mysterious may at such a moment
overpower other feelings, and make the whole mental condition one of
dream-like trance.
Since children are left so little free to deck themselves, it is of
course hard to study the development of æsthetic taste in this domain of
art-like activity. Yet the quaint attempts of the child to improve his
appearance throw an interesting light on his æsthetic preferences. He is
at heart as much a lover of glitter, of gaudy colour, as his savage
prototype. With this general crudity of taste, individual differences
soon begin to show themselves, a child developing a marked bent, now to
modest neatness and refinement, now to gaudy display, and this, it may
be, in direct opposition to the whole trend of home influence.[219]
-----
Footnote 219:
The whole subject of the attitude of the child-mind towards dress and
ornament is well dealt with by Perez, _op. cit._, chap. i.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account