Studies of the Greek Poets (Vol 1 of 2)Symonds, John Addington
History
Studies of the Greek Poets (Vol 1 of 2)
Symonds, John Addington
Greek poetry -- History and criticism
Such, briefly stated, is the theory of Empedocles. The following
passage may be quoted to show how the phenomenal Universe comes into
being under the influence of love:
"When strife has reached the very bottom of the seething mass,
and love assumes her station in the centre of the ball, then
everything begins to come together, and to form one whole--not
instantaneously, but different substances come forth, according
to a steady process of development. Now, when these elements
are mingling, countless kinds of things issue from their union.
Much, however, remains unmixed, in opposition to the mingling
elements, and these malignant strife still holds within his
grasp. For he has not yet withdrawn himself altogether to the
extremities of the globe; but part of his limbs still remain
within its bounds, and part have passed beyond. As strife,
however, step by step, retreats, mild and innocent love pursues
him with her force divine; things which had been immortal
instantly assume mortality; the simple elements become confused
by interchange of influence. When these are mingled, then the
countless kinds of mortal beings issue forth, furnished with
every sort of form--a sight of wonder."
In another passage this development is compared to the operation
of a painter mixing his colors, and forming with them a picture of
various objects. Discord is said to have made the elements immortal,
because he kept them apart, and would willingly have preserved their
separate qualities; whereas love mixes them together, breaks up
their continuity, and confuses their kinds. What Empedocles exactly
meant by Sphæris is hard to understand; nor do we know how far he
intended Chance to operate in the formation of the Universe. He often
uses such expressions as these, "So they chanced to come together,"
and describes the amorphous condition of the first organisms in a
way that makes one think he fancied a perfectly chaotic origin.
Yet "the art of Aphrodite," "so Cypris ordained their form," are
assertions of designing intelligence. In fact, we may well believe
that Empedocles, in the infancy of speculation, was led astray by his
double nomenclature. When talking of Aphrodite, he naturally thought
of a person ruling creation; when using the term "Love," he naturally
conceived an innate tendency, which might have been the sport of chance
in a great measure. It also appears probable that, when Empedocles
spoke of "Chance" and "Necessity," he referred to some inherent quality
in the elements themselves, whereby they grew together under certain
laws, and that the harmony and discord which ruled them in turn were
regarded by him as forces aiding and preventing their union.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account