Submarine Warfare, Past, Present, and FutureFyfe, Herbert C.
History
Submarine Warfare, Past, Present, and Future
Fyfe, Herbert C.
Submarine warfare
In the year 1806 Fulton returned to New York and made overtures to the
United States Government. Receiving some encouragement he succeeded,
after many unsuccessful efforts, in blowing up a vessel which had been
prepared for the purpose. Admiral Porter in 1878 wrote, “A Midshipman
nowadays at our Torpedo School at Newport, would consider himself
disgraced if he failed to destroy a ship of the line in ten minutes with
less explosive powder, especially if the ship lay at anchor and gave him
every opportunity to operate upon her.” The admiral seems to forget that
Fulton was a pioneer, and laboured under every possible disadvantage in
prosecuting his work.
In 1810 Congress appropriated 5,000 dollars to assist Fulton in
developing his ideas. After many trials, most of which were failures,
the United States brig _Argus_ was prepared for Fulton’s final
experiment. By order of Commodore Rodgers, the vessel had been so
protected with spars and netting reaching to the bottom as to be
practically unassailable, and the attempt to blow her up by a submarine
torpedo was unsuccessful, as Fulton himself acknowledged, though he
could not refrain from adding that “a system then in its infancy, which
compelled a hostile vessel to guard herself by such extraordinary means,
could not fail of becoming a most important mode of warfare.”
Could Fulton have foreseen the manner in which his crude devices were to
develop into the Whitehead torpedo and submarine boat of to-day, he
would have had something to cheer him in his hours of depression.
After the failure of the _Argus_ experiment, Fulton devoted his
attention to steam navigation, and was more successful in this line than
in his efforts to introduce torpedo warfare, though he considered the
latter a matter of greater moment than the former.
In a letter to Joel Barlow, dated New York, August 22, 1807, Fulton
says, after describing his celebrated steam voyage up the Hudson:—
“However, I will not admit that it (steam navigation) is half so
important as the torpedo system of defence or attack, for out of this
will grow the liberty of the seas—an object of infinite importance to
the welfare of America and every civilised country. But thousands of
witnesses have now seen the steamboat in rapid movement and they
believe; but they have not seen a ship of war destroyed by a torpedo,
and they do not believe. We cannot expect people in general to have
knowledge of physics or power to reason from cause to effect, but in
case we have war and the enemy’s ships come into our waters, if the
Government will give me reasonable means of action, I will soon convince
the world that we have surer and cheaper modes of defence than they are
aware of.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account