Submarine Warfare, Past, Present, and FutureFyfe, Herbert C.
History
Submarine Warfare, Past, Present, and Future
Fyfe, Herbert C.
Submarine warfare
This “dishonourable attempt,” evidently made under the sanction of the
American executive, induced Sir Thomas Hardy to address letters to the
public authorities of New London, and to the Government of the States of
Connecticut on the subject. In these Sir Thomas Hardy states that “he is
fully apprised of the efforts to destroy the _Ramilies_, and that he
shall do all in his power to defeat them, but he thinks it right to
notify publicly that since the attempt he had ordered on board from
fifty to a hundred American prisoners of war, who in the event of the
efforts to destroy the ship by torpedoes or other infernal inventions
being successful, would share the fate of himself and his crew. That in
future whenever a vessel was taken, the crew would be kept on board
until it has ascertained that no snare was laid for the destruction of
British seamen, and that the regulations would be observed when a vessel
was boarded and abandoned by her crew.”
Sir Thomas adds that his example would be followed by all the commanders
of his squadron.
These representations had some effect on the American public, for on the
contents of the letter being known a public meeting was held, and as
many of the citizens had relations and friends prisoners of war on board
the British squadron, it was determined to present a remonstrance to the
American executive against the further employment of torpedoes in the
ordinary course of warfare.
Admiral Porter says that these submarine attacks were mostly
unauthorised by the U.S. Government, and disapproved by the navy, “who
preferred the more chivalric method of sinking vessels with eighteen and
twenty-four pounders, or mowing down their crews with grape and
canister.”
It is almost certain that the submarine craft that attacked H.M.S.
_Ramilies_ as she lay off New London was one of Fulton’s boats.
In the year 1814 Fulton constructed the _Mute_, a huge submarine capable
of holding a hundred men, and deriving its name from the silent engine
that propelled it. The _Mute_ was 80 feet 6 inches long, 21 feet wide,
and 11 feet deep. It was armoured on the top with iron sheets, beneath
which was a wood lining almost a foot in thickness. Before the trials
could be completed Fulton died, and thus the story of this ardent
inventor’s notions concerning submarine warfare comes to a close.
In 1810 Fulton published at New York a book, “Torpedo War and Submarine
Explosions,” in which he gives an account of the various devices he had
contrived for blowing up ships, piers, &c., and of the actual
experiments he had made. He seems to have elaborated his submarine boat
after his torpedo had been invented, and his idea was that an
under-water vessel would be useful in discharging torpedoes. His method
of attack was to float the torpedo down to the object to be attacked,
and to guide and even explode them by means of lines. He seemed not to
have thought of the use of the spar torpedo as we know it to-day.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account