Submarine Warfare, Past, Present, and FutureFyfe, Herbert C.
History
Submarine Warfare, Past, Present, and Future
Fyfe, Herbert C.
Submarine warfare
Such a system (as a French writer has pointed out) is very faulty and
dangerous, as may be easily conceived. In the first place, considering
the feeble resistance which a canvas can oppose even when mounted on
steel springs, it was indispensable to protect it against the pressure
of the water during the “dive.” This was believed to have been
accomplished by providing the shell with an indiarubber crown, forming a
sort of beak, which, when the system was completely folded up and
closed, came to rest on another washer of indiarubber placed at the
bottom of a groove, where it formed a watertight joint. This would have
been very good if there had been certitude that the beak or cap fixed on
the shell rested exactly at the bottom of the groove. To make sure of
that there had been arranged a small opening, which ought to give water
when the closure was not sufficient, but this only gave an almost
illusory means of control, the opening being found almost always
obstructed by some detritus, _débris_ of sea-wrack, and other foreign
bodies encountered by the vessel. It will be seen what permanent danger
was created by this apparatus—danger which on two occasions just missed
causing the loss of the craft, an unlooked-for chance alone preventing
it from foundering.
It would further be easy to show that in spite of its danger the movable
shell, with canvas folded in accordion pleats, was almost unusable—that
it could not serve when there was a slight sea on; that it caused, even
during progress on the water-line, infiltrations capable of sinking the
boat; and finally that, even in a calm sea and under the best
conditions, the length of the manœuvre of raising and lowering made the
operations of the “dive” slow and wanting in precision—operations which
demand so much rapidity and delicacy, and to which alone it is allowable
to sacrifice something on a submarine boat. This movable shell was 0·35
metre (about 13½ to 14 inches) in diameter; it was abandoned after all
the Commandants had successively condemned it, and to-day it is never
used.
For use below the surface the _Gymnote_ carries an optical tube with two
inclined mirrors and a periscope, but these have so far given but poor
results.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account