Submarine Warfare, Past, Present, and FutureFyfe, Herbert C.
History
Submarine Warfare, Past, Present, and Future
Fyfe, Herbert C.
Submarine warfare
“When the first submarine torpedo-boat goes into action she will
bring us face to face with the most puzzling problem ever met in
warfare. She will present the unique spectacle, when used in attack,
of a weapon against which there is no defence. You can pit sword
against sword, rifle against rifle, cannon against cannon, ironclad
against ironclad; you can send torpedo-boat destroyers against
torpedo-boats, and destroyers against destroyers, but you can send
nothing against the submarine boat, not even itself. You cannot
fight submarines with submarines. The fanciful descriptions of the
submarine battle of the future have one fatal defect. You cannot see
under water. Hence you cannot fight under water. Hence you cannot
defend yourself against an attack under water except by running
away. If you cannot run away you are doomed. Wharves, shipping at
anchor, the buildings in seaport towns, cannot run away, therefore
the sending of a submarine against them means their inevitable
destruction. No; as nearly as the human mind can discern now, the
submarine is indeed a ‘sea-devil’ against which no means that we
possess at present can prevail. It is no use for the defence to
mine, for the submarine would countermine, and torpedo nets would be
of no use, for it would blow a hole through them, and any attempt to
discover the position of the boat when below the surface is about as
promising a pursuit as dredging with a butterfly-net for a
half-dollar that had been thrown into New York Bay.”
In the present state of the science of submarine warfare it is certainly
impossible to fight submarines with submarines, and it is recognised
that the best chance of destroying an under-water vessel is when it
comes to the surface to take a momentary glance at the position of its
victim before launching its torpedo.
When a means of distinguishing objects beneath the waves has been
evolved then it will be time enough to discuss the possibility of
constructing a submarine boat destroyer which shall itself go beneath
the surface and seek out the submarine to deal it its deathblow.
Every advance in military and naval science that tends to strengthen the
attack has been met by some invention or device calculated to enable the
defence to withstand it.
In the early days men went into battle wearing heavy armour, but
nowadays, although bullet-proof cuirasses and bullet-proof shields have
been suggested, the foot soldier carries no protection on his person,
but relies instead upon entrenchments and fortifications.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account