Subspeciation in the Kangaroo Rat, Dipodomys ordii: KU. Vol 1 No 23Setzer, Henry W.
Science
Subspeciation in the Kangaroo Rat, Dipodomys ordii: KU. Vol 1 No 23
Setzer, Henry W.
Kangaroo rats
[Illustration: FIG. 25. Known occurrences and probable geographic range
of the subspecies of _Dipodomys ordii_ in the northeastern fourth of the
range of the species.
1. _D. o. richardsoni_ 8. _D. o. terrosus_ 18. _D. o. montanus_
2. _D. o. oklahomae_ 10. _D. o. uintensis_ 24. _D. o. priscus_
5. _D. o. evexus_ 11. _D. o. sanrafaeli_ 31. _D. o. longipes_
6. _D. o. medius_ 15. _D. o. luteolus_ 33. _D. o. nexilis_ ]
From _Dipodomys ordii obscurus_, _D. o. extractus_ differs as
follows: Size larger; color lighter; skull larger in all respects,
notably in least interorbital width, greatest length of skull and
breadth across auditory bullae; zygomatic arches less robust and
straight as opposed to robust and bowed laterally; pterygoid fossae
subcircular as opposed to circular; auditory bullae more inflated
ventrally.
From _Dipodomys ordii idoneus_, _D. o. extractus_ differs in: Size
larger; color lighter; skull larger in all measurements taken
except least interorbital width and breadth across maxillary
arches which are smaller; nasals longer and narrower; braincase
less vaulted; zygomatic arches less robust and more nearly
straight; auditory bullae less inflated ventrally.
_Remarks._--This subspecies of _Dipodomys ordii_ is the palest of
any of the known races from Mexico. It inhabits an area of light-colored
sandy soil at the type locality.
The only subspecies with which _D. o. extractus_ really needs comparison
is _Dipodomys ordii ordii_ from which it differs as described above. The
series which is herein described contains two individuals that resemble
_D. o. ordii_ cranially and three that resemble it in color although
they are somewhat paler. One specimen, MVZ no. 76560, is the palest of
any of the series, has a short tail and in these respects resembles the
pale form of _Dipodomys ordii compactus_. It is apparent from the skull
of this latter individual that it is not _D. o. compactus_ but _D. o.
extractus_.
_Dipodomys ordii ordii_ inhabits, in most of its range, dark-colored
soils, whereas _D. o. extractus_ inhabits light-colored soils. Possibly
the differentiation that has occurred is a result of an ecological
separation much as occurs with _Perognathus_ on the white sands and
black lavas of the Tularosa Basin of New Mexico (see Benson,
1933).
_Specimens examined._--Total, 14, all from Chihuahua, as follows: 1
mi. E Samalayuca, 4500 ft., 14 (MVZ).
=Dipodomys ordii chapmani= Mearns
_Dipodomys chapmani_ Mearns, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 2:291,
February 21, 1890.
_Cricetodipus chapmani_, Trouessart, Catalogus Mammalium, 1:581,
1897.
_Perodipus chapmani_, Elliot, Field Columbian Museum, Zool. Ser.,
2:237, 1901.
_Perodipus ordii chapmani_, Goldman, Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington,
30:113, May 23, 1917.
_Dipodomys ordii chapmani_, Grinnell, Journ. Mamm., 2:96, May 2,
1921.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account