Subspeciation in the Kangaroo Rat, Dipodomys ordii: KU. Vol 1 No 23Setzer, Henry W.
Science
Subspeciation in the Kangaroo Rat, Dipodomys ordii: KU. Vol 1 No 23
Setzer, Henry W.
Kangaroo rats
_Perodipus longipes_, Warren, Mammals of Colorado, p. 77, 1910
(part--the part from Coventry, Colorado).
_Dipodomys ordii longipes_, Moore, Journ. Mamm., 10:260, August,
1929 (part--the part from Monticello, Utah).
_Type._--Male, adult, no. 149938, U. S. Nat. Mus. Biol. Surv.
Coll.; 5 mi. W Naturita, Montrose County, Colorado; obtained on
July 20, 1907, by Merritt Cary, original no. 1068.
_Range._--West-central Colorado, southwest into San Juan County,
Utah, north of the San Juan River; northwest into Grand County,
Utah, to the Colorado River; and westward probably as far as the
Colorado River; marginal occurrences are: in Utah, Cisco, 18 mi. NE
Moab, and Blanding; in Colorado, 5 mi. W Naturita, and Coventry.
_Diagnosis._--Size medium (see measurements). Color dark, entire
dorsal surface between (_a_) Cinnamon-Buff and Clay Color, purest
on sides and flanks, upper parts strongly suffused with black;
arietiform markings, pinnae of ears, plantar surfaces of hind
feet, dorsal and ventral tail-stripes blackish. Lateral white
stripes of tail less than one fourth of diameter of tail. Skull
large; rostrum long and narrow; nasals long; auditory bullae
strongly inflated; braincase not inflated; pterygoid fossae ovoid.
_Comparisons._--From _Dipodomys ordii sanrafaeli_, _D. o. nexilis_
differs in: Color darker; skull smaller in all measurements taken;
auditory bullae noticeably smaller; width across zygomatic
processes of maxillae less.
From _Dipodomys ordii longipes_, _D. o. nexilis_ differs in: Size
smaller; color darker in all respects; rostrum wider; breadth
across auditory bullae less; interorbital width greater; breadth
across zygomatic processes of maxillae less; cutting edge of upper
incisors wider; zygomatic arch lighter and more nearly straight.
Comparison with _Dipodomys ordii evexus_ is made in account of
that subspecies.
_Remarks._--This animal is apparently not abundant at any place in its
range. Two different attempts, by me, to obtain topotypes were
unsuccessful. A single specimen was obtained and that was only a skull
saved from a mutilated animal that was taken away from a rattlesnake.
The habitat at the type locality is such that a person would not expect
it to be inhabited by kangaroo rats. The soil is a heavy clay with a
generous admixture of stones but in isolated spots there are light sandy
soils which should be suitable for kangaroo rats. Even so, 500 traps set
in the area of the type locality over a period of two nights yielded no
_Dipodomys_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account