"Fair? Of course I'm not. How should I be? No; I would not destroy the
system. Merely deodorize it a bit. But I suppose the public likes the
odors. It sniffs 'em up like--like Cyrano in the bake-shop. A marvelous
institution, the public which you and I serve. Have you ever thought of
magazine work, Mr. Banneker?"
"A little."
"There might be a considerable future there for you. I say 'might.'
Nothing is more uncertain. But you have certain--er--stigmata of the
writer--That article, now, about the funereal eulogies over the old
builder; did you report that talk as it was?"
"Approximately."
"How approximately?"
"Well; the basic idea was there. The old fellows gave me that, and I
fitted it up with talk. Surely there's nothing dishonest in that,"
protested Banneker.
"Surely not," agreed the other. "You gave the essence of the thing. That
is a higher veracity than any literal reporting which would be dull and
unreadable. I thought I recognized the fictional quality in the
dialogue."
"But it wasn't fiction," denied Banneker eagerly.
The Great Gaines gave forth one of his oracles. "But it was. Good
dialogue is talk as it should be talked, just as good fiction is life as
it should be lived--logically and consecutively. Why don't you try
something for The New Era?"
"I have."
"When?"
"Before I got your note."
"It never reached me."
"It never reached anybody. It's in my desk, ripening."
"Send it along, green, won't you? It may give more indications that way.
And first work is likely to be valuable chiefly as indication."
"I'll mail it to you. Before I go, would you mind telling me more
definitely why you advise me against the newspaper business?"
"I advise? I never advise as to questions of morals or ethics. I have
too much concern with keeping my own straight."
"Then it _is_ a question of morals?"
"Or ethics. I think so. For example, have you tried your hand at
editorials?"
"Yes."
"Successfully?"
"As far as I've gone."
"Then you are in accord with the editorial policy of The Ledger?"
"Not in everything."
"In its underlying, unexpressed, and immanent theory that this country
can best be managed by an aristocracy, a chosen few, working under the
guise of democracy?"
"No; I don't believe that, of course."
"I do, as it happens. But I fail to see how Christian Banneker's son and
_eleve_ could. Yet you write editorials for The Ledger."
"Not on those topics."
"Have you never had your editorials altered or cut or amended, in such
manner as to give a side-slant toward the paper's editorial fetiches?"
Again and most uncomfortably Banneker felt his color change. "Yes; I
have," he admitted.
"What did you do?"
"What could I do? The Chief controls the editorial page."
"You might have stopped writing for it."
"I needed the money. No; that isn't true. More than the money, I wanted
the practice and the knowledge that I could write editorials if I wished
to."
"Are you thinking of going on the editorial side?"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account