Sun Tzŭ on the Art of War: The Oldest Military Treatise in the WorldSunzi, active 6th century B.C.
Philosophy
Sun Tzŭ on the Art of War: The Oldest Military Treatise in the World
Sunzi, active 6th century B.C.
Military art and science -- Early works to 1800; War -- Early works to 1800
[146] Preface to Sun Tzŭ: 孔子曰軍旅之事未之學又曰我戰則克孔子定禮正樂兵則五禮
之一不必以爲專門之學故云未學所爲聖人有所不知或行軍好謀則學之或善將將如伍子胥之用
孫子又何必自學之故又曰我戰則克也.
[147] See p. 166.
[148] This is a rather obscure allusion to _Tso Chuan_, 襄公, XXXI. 4,
where Tzŭ-ch‘an says: 子有美錦不使人學製焉 “If you have a piece of
beautiful brocade, you will not employ a mere learner to make it up.”
[149] Cf. _Tao Tê Ching_, ch. 31: 兵者不祥之器.
[150] Sun Hsing-yen might have quoted Confucius again. See _Lun Yü_,
XIII. 29, 30.
[151] 今世泥孔子之言以爲兵書不足觀又泥趙括徒能讀父書之言以爲成法不足用又見兵書有
權謀有反間以爲非聖人之法皆不知吾儒之學者吏之治事可習而能然古人猶有學製之懼兵凶戰危
將不素習未可以人命爲嘗試則十三篇之不可不觀也.
[152] Better known as Hsiang 羽 Yü [B.C. 233–202].
[153] The third among the 五伯 (or 霸) enumerated on p. 141. For the
incident referred to, see _Tso Chuan_, 僖公, XXII. 4.
[154] See _supra_, p. xvi, note 4.
[155] _Shih Chi_, ch. 47, f. 7 _r_^o.
[156] _Ibid._, ch. 38, f. 8 _v_^o.
[157] 項梁教籍兵法籍略知其意不肯竟學卒以傾覆不知兵法之弊可勝言哉宋襄徐偃仁而敗兵
者危機當用權謀孔子猶有要盟勿信微服過宋之時安得妄責孫子以言之不純哉.
[158] 其時去古未遠三代遺規往往於此書見之.
[159] 其最古者當以孫子吳子司馬法爲本大抵生聚訓練之術權謀運用之宜而已.
[160] See p. 174. Further details on T‘ai Kung will be found in the
_Shih Chi_, ch. 32 _ad init._ Besides the tradition which makes him a
former minister of Chou Hsin, two other accounts of him are there
given, according to which he would appear to have been first raised
from a humble private station by Wên Wang.
[161] 其文義不類三代.
[162] 其言多近於正與戰國權謀頗殊.
[163] See _Han Shu_, 張良傳, ch. 40. The work is there called 太公兵法.
Hence it has been confused with the _Liu T‘ao_. The _T‘u Shu_
attributes both the _Liu T‘ao_ and the _San Lüeh_ to T‘ai Kung.
[164] 其文不類秦漢間書漢光武帝詔雖嘗引之安知非反摭詔中所引二語以證實其書謂之北宋
以前舊本則可矣. Another work said to have been written by Huang-shih
Kung, and also included in the military section of the Imperial
Catalogue, is the 素書 _Su Shu_ in 1 _chüan_. A short ethical treatise
of Taoist savour, having no reference whatever to war, it is
pronounced a forgery from the hand of 張商英 Chang Shang-ying
(_d._ 1121), who edited it with commentary. Correct Wylie’s “Notes,”
new edition, p. 90, and Courant’s “Catalogue des Livres Chinois,”
no. 5056.
[165] 其書雖僞亦出於有學識謀略者之手也. We are told in the 讀書志 that the
above six works, together with Sun Tzŭ, were those prescribed for
military training in the 元豐 period (1078–85). See _Yü Hai_, ch. 140,
f. 4 _r_^o.
[166] Also written 握機經 and 幄機經 _Wu Chi Ching_.
[167] 其言具有條理.
[168] “Words on Wellington,” by Sir W. Fraser.
[169] “Forty-one Years in India,” chap. 46.
[170] See Col. Henderson’s biography of Stonewall Jackson, 1902 ed.,
vol. II, p. 490.
[171] _See_ Col. Henderson, _op. cit._ vol. I. p. 426.
[172] For a number of maxims on this head, see “Marshal Turenne”
(Longmans, 1907), p. 29.
[173] “Marshal Turenne,” p. 50.
[174] “Aids to Scouting,” p. 26.
[175] See “Pensées de Napoléon I^{er},” no. 47.
[176] “The Science of War,” chap. 2.
[177] “Aids to Scouting,” p. xii.
[178] “Maximes de Guerre,” no. 72.
[179] Giles’ Biographical Dictionary, no. 399.
[180] “The Science of War,” p. 333.
[181] “Stonewall Jackson,” vol. I, p. 421.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account