Sun Tzŭ on the Art of War: The Oldest Military Treatise in the WorldSunzi, active 6th century B.C.
Philosophy
Sun Tzŭ on the Art of War: The Oldest Military Treatise in the World
Sunzi, active 6th century B.C.
Military art and science -- Early works to 1800; War -- Early works to 1800
tails acted as torches, showing up the hideous pattern on their
bodies, and the weapons on their horns killed or wounded any with
whom they came into contact. In the meantime, the band of 5000 had
crept up with gags in their mouths, and now threw themselves on
the enemy. At the same moment a frightful din arose in the city
itself, all those that remained behind making as much noise as
possible by banging drums and hammering on bronze vessels, until
heaven and earth were convulsed by the uproar. Terror-stricken,
the Yen army fled in disorder, hotly pursued by the men of Ch‘i,
who succeeded in slaying their general Ch‘i Chieh.... The result
of the battle was the ultimate recovery of some seventy cities
which had belonged to the Ch‘i State.”
Violent language and driving forward as if to the attack are signs
that he will retreat.
I follow the original text here, also adopted by the _T‘u Shu_.
The standard text reads 辭詭而强進驅者退也 on the strength of Ts‘ao
Kung’s commentary 詭詐也, which shows that his text included
the word 詭. Strong as this ground is, I do not think it can
counterbalance the obvious superiority of the other reading in
point of sense. 詭 not only provides no antithesis to 卑, but makes
the whole passage absurd; for if the language of the enemy is
calculated to deceive, it cannot be known as deceitful at the
time, and can therefore afford no “sign.” Moreover, the extra word
in 强進驅者 (an awkward locution, by the way) spoils the parallelism
with 益備者.
25. 輕車先出居其側者陳也
When the light chariots
The same, according to Tu Yu, as the 馳車 of II. § 1.
come out first and take up a position on the wings, it is a sign that
the enemy is forming for battle.
The _T‘ung Tien_ omits 出.
26. 無約而請和者謀也
Peace proposals unaccompanied by a sworn covenant indicate a plot.
Tu Yu defines 約 as 要約, and Li Ch‘üan as 質盟之約 “a treaty
confirmed by oaths and hostages.” Wang Hsi and Chang Yü, on the
other hand, simply say 無故 “without reason,” “on a frivolous
pretext,” as though 約 bore the rather unusual sense of
“important.” Capt. Calthrop has “without consultation,” which is
too loose.
27. 奔走而陳兵者期也
When there is much running about
Every man hastening to his proper place under his own regimental
banner.
and the soldiers fall into rank,
I follow the _T‘u Shu_ in omitting 車 after 兵. Tu Mu quotes the
_Chou Li_, ch. xxix. fol. 31: 車驟徒趨及表乃止.
it means that the critical moment has come.
What Chia Lin calls 晷刻之期, as opposed to 尋常之期.
28. 半進半退者誘也
When some are seen advancing and some retreating, it is a lure.
Capt. Calthrop is hardly right in translating: “An advance,
followed by sudden retirement.” It is rather a case of feigned
confusion. As Tu Mu says: 僞爲雜亂不整之狀.
29. 倚仗而立者飢也
When the soldiers stand leaning on their spears, they are faint from
want of food.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account