1 We venture to add a passage from Mr. Herbert Spencer's
"Social Statics," which we have met with for the first time
since this work was published, in illustration of this
assertion. Mr. Spencer affirms "the evanescence of evil" and
the perfectibility of man, upon the ground that: "All evil
results from the non-adaptation of constitution to
conditions." After an elaborate demonstration of this, he
resumes as follows: "If there be any conclusiveness in the
foregoing arguments, such a faith is well founded. As
commonly supported by evidence drawn from history, it cannot
be considered indisputable. The inference that as
adyancement has been hitherto the rule, it will be the rule
henceforth, may be called a plausible speculation. But when
it is shown that this adyancement is due to the working of a
universal law; and that in virtue of that law it must
continue until the state we call perfection is reached, then
the advent of such a state is removed out of the region of
probability into that of certainty. If any one demurs to
this let him point out the error. Here are the several steps
of the argument. All imperfection is unfitness to the
conditions of existence.
This unfitness must consist either in having a faculty or
faculties in excess; or in having a faculty or faculties
deficient; or in both.
A faculty in excess is one which the conditions of existence
do not afford full exercise to; and a faculty that is
deficient is one from which the conditions of existence
demand more than it can perform.
But it is an essential principle of life that a faculty to
which circumstances do not allow full exercise diminishes;
and that a faculty on which circumstances make excessive
demands increases.
And so long as this excess and this deficiency continue,
there must continue decrease on the one hand, and growth on
the other.
Finally all excess and all deficiency must disappear, that
is, all unfitness must disappear; that is, all imperfection
must disappear.
Thus the ultimate development of the ideal man is logically
certain as certain as any conclusion in which we place the
most implicit faith; for instance, that all men will die.
For why do we infer that all men will die P Simply because,
in an immense number of past experiences, death has
uniformly occurred. Similarly then as the experiences of all
people in all timesexperiences that are embodied in maxims,
proverbs, and moral precepts, and that are illustrated in
biographies and histories, go to prove that organs,
faculties, powers, capacities, or whatever else we call them
grow by use and diminish from disuse, it is inferred that
they will continue to do so. And if this inference is
unquestionable,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account