These had not undergone the rite of circumcision, and therefore were
not participators in the Covenant, but merely worshipped the God
of Israel,(4) and were only compelled to observe the seven Noachian
prescriptions. These Proselytes of the Gate, however, were little more
than on sufferance. They were excluded from the Temple, and even the
Acts of the Apostles represent it to be pollution for a Jew to have
intercourse with them: it requires direct Divine intervention to induce
Peter to go to Cornelius, and to excuse his doing so in the eyes of the
primitive Church.(3) Nothing short of circumcision and full observance
of the Mosaic law could secure the privileges of the Covenant with
Israel to a stranger, and in illustration of this we may again point to
the Acts, where certain who came from Judaea, members of the primitive
church, teach the Christians of Antioch: "Except ye have been
circumcised after the custom of Moses ye cannot be saved."(4)
1 We need not discuss the chronology of this class.
2 It is scarcely necessary to speak of the well-known case
of Lzates, King of Adiabene, related by Josephus. The Jewish
merchant Ananias, who teaches him to worship God according
to the religion of the Jews, is willing, evidently from the
special emergency of the case and the danger of forcing
Izates fully to embrace Judaism in the face of his people,
to let him remain a mere Jahveh worshipper, only partially
conforming to the Law, and remaining uncircumcised'; but
another Jew from Galilee, Eleazer, versed in Jewish
learning, points out to him that, in neglecting
circumcision, he breaks the principal point of the Law.
Izates then has himself circumcised. Josephus, Antiq. xx.
2, Sec. 3 f.
3 Acts x. 2 ff, xi. 2 ft. Dr. Lightfoot says: "The Apostles
of the circumcision, even St. Peter himself, had failed
hitherto to comprehend the wide purpose of God. With their
fellow-countrymen they still held it unlawful for a Jew to
keep company with an alien' (Acts x. 28)." Galatians, p.
290.
{139}
This will be more fully shown as we proceed. The conversion of the
Gentiles was not, therefore, in the least degree an idea foreign to
Judaism, but, on the contrary, formed an intimate part of the Messianic
expectation of the later prophets. The conditions of admission to the
privileges and promises of the Covenant, however, were full acceptance
of the Mosaic law, and submission to the initiatory rite.(1) That small
and comparatively insignificant people, with an arrogance that would
have been ridiculous if, in the influence which they have actually
exerted over the world, it had not been almost sublime, not only
supposed themselves the sole and privileged recipients of the oracles
of God, as his chosen and peculiar people, but they contemplated nothing
short of universal submission to the Mosaic code, and the supremacy of
Israel over all the earth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account