Supplemental Nights to the Book of the Thousand and One Nights — Volume 2 (of 6)
General
Supplemental Nights to the Book of the Thousand and One Nights — Volume 2 (of 6)
Fairy tales; Tales -- Arab countries
Arab. “Shawáhid,” meaning that heart testifies to heart.
Footnote 172:
_i.e._ A live coal, afterwards called Zalzalah, an earthquake; see
post p. 105. “Wakhímah” = an unhealthy land, and “Sharárah” = a spark.
Footnote 173:
I need hardly note the inscriptions upon the metal trays sold to
Europeans. They are usually imitation words so that infidel eyes may
not look upon the formulæ of prayer; and the same is the case with
table-cloths, etc., showing a fancy Tohgra or Sultanic sign-manual.
Footnote 174:
_i.e._ I cannot look at them long.
Footnote 175:
Evidently a diabolical way of clapping his hands in applause. This
description of the Foul Fiend has an element of grotesqueness which is
rather Christian than Moslem.
Footnote 176:
Arab. “Rikkí al-Saut,” which may also mean either “lower thy voice,”
or “change the air to one less touching.”
Footnote 177:
“Your” for “thy.”
Footnote 178:
_i.e._ written on the “Guarded Tablet” from all eternity.
Footnote 179:
Arab. “Al-’Urs w’al-Tuhúr” which can only mean, “the wedding (which
does not drop out of the tale) and the circumcision.”
Footnote 180:
I here propose to consider at some length this curious custom which
has prevailed amongst so many widely separated races. Its object has
been noted (vol. v. 209), viz. to diminish the sensibility of the
glans, no longer lubricated with prostatic lymph; thus the part is
hardened against injury and disease and its work in coition is
prolonged. On the other hand “præputium in coitu voluptatem (of the
woman) auget, unde femina præputiatis concubitum malunt quam cum
Turcis ac Judæis” says Dimerbroeck (Anatomie). I vehemently doubt the
fact. Circumcision was doubtless practised from ages immemorial by the
peoples of Central Africa, and Welcker found traces of it in a mummy
of the xvith century B.C. The Jews borrowed it from the Egyptian
priesthood and made it a manner of sacrament, “uncircumcised” being =
“unbaptised,” that is, barbarian, heretic; it was a seal of
reconciliation, a sign of alliance between the Creator and the Chosen
People, a token of nationality imposed upon the body politic. Thus it
became a cruel and odious protestation against the brotherhood of man,
and the cosmopolitan Romans derided the verpæ ac verpi. The Jews also
used the term figuratively as the “circumcision of fruits” (Lev. xix.
23), and of the heart (Deut. x. 16); and the old law gives copious
historical details of its origin and continuance. Abraham first
amputated his horny “calotte” at æt. 99, and did the same for his son
and household (Gen. xvii. 24–27). The rite caused a separation between
Moses and his wife (Exod. iv. 25). It was suspended during the Desert
Wanderings and was resumed by Joshua (v. 3–7), who cut off two tons
weight of prepuces. The latter became, like the scalps of the
Scythians and North-American “Indians,” trophies of victory; Saul
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account