Surgical Experiences in South Africa, 1899-1900: Being Mainly a Clinical Study of the Nature and Effects of Injuries Produced by Bullets of Small CalibreMakins, George Henry
History
Surgical Experiences in South Africa, 1899-1900: Being Mainly a Clinical Study of the Nature and Effects of Injuries Produced by Bullets of Small Calibre
Makins, George Henry
Gunshot wounds; South African War, 1899-1902; Surgery, Military
Lastly, we come to the cases in which primary amputation is necessary. I
may say at once that I saw no case of wound from a bullet of small
calibre in which this was indicated, and only one shell injury in which
it was performed. I believe with small bullets that injury to the main
blood-vessels is almost the only indication which is likely to be met
with, and this by no means always indicates an amputation. First of all
the question arises as to whether the wound in the vessel is caused by a
bone fragment or by the bullet itself; reference to the chapter on
blood-vessels would seem to prove that a bullet wound is by no means a
necessary indication for amputation. Given favourable conditions, it
might be treated locally by ligature at the time, while if haemorrhage is
not proceeding, developments should be awaited before proceeding to
amputation. In the case of bone fragment punctures, secondary haemorrhage
is a more likely indication for amputation than primary.
Broadly, it may be laid down that very extensive injury to the soft
parts is the only indication for primary amputation beyond primary
haemorrhage, and it may be added that the condition is rare with wounds
from small-calibre bullets. If a primary amputation is necessary the
observations as to the transport of fractured thighs are equally
applicable. I never saw a primary amputation do well that was moved
during the first week; sloughing of flaps or haemorrhage followed as a
rule, and often death.
Intermediate amputations were indicated in cases of septic infection and
those of haemorrhage; they seldom did well, and should be avoided if
possible. Secondary amputations for sepsis or haemorrhage were attended
by fair results, but I can give no statistics. Unless extensive
osteo-myelitis is evident, or very widespread cellulitis of the limb
exists, I am strongly of opinion that the amputations when the fractures
are above the middle of the thigh should be through the fracture, and
not at the hip-joint, even if a subsequent secondary operation is
risked.
[Illustration: PLATE XXI.
Skiagram by H. CATLING.
Engraved and Printed by Bale and Danielsson, Ltd.
(39) PERFORATION OF THE SHAFT OF THE TIBIA, AND INCOMPLETE OBLIQUE
FISSURE EXTENDING FROM THE LOWER PART OF THE OPENING TO THE CREST OF THE
BONE.
Range medium. Entry and exit wounds at same level.
The patient was standing when struck, and fell backwards, his rifle
falling at the same time and striking the shin. The fibula is intact.
The perforation indicated by the well-marked translucent spot is small.
The forking of the lower extremity of the cleft suggests the starting of
the fissure from above. The fissure comes to the surface at the seat of
election, but its position may possibly have been determined by the blow
from the falling rifle.
The backward fall of the patient clearly explains the mechanism of
production of the fissure, and throws light on the production of an
oblique fracture such as shown in plate XVI.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account