Surgical Experiences in South Africa, 1899-1900: Being Mainly a Clinical Study of the Nature and Effects of Injuries Produced by Bullets of Small CalibreMakins, George Henry
History
Surgical Experiences in South Africa, 1899-1900: Being Mainly a Clinical Study of the Nature and Effects of Injuries Produced by Bullets of Small Calibre
Makins, George Henry
Gunshot wounds; South African War, 1899-1902; Surgery, Military
In cases where the wounds were in the frontal or fronto-parietal
regions, and hemiplegia existed, the rapid improvement in the paralytic
symptoms, after operation, was very marked, showing that the signs were
mainly, or entirely, due to 'radiation' injury. I am inclined to think
that temporary injury of this kind from vibratory disturbance and small
parenchymatous haemorrhages, were far more often the cause of the
paralysis than surface haemorrhage, since the latter was rarely found in
large quantity. Large clots, however, no doubt growing in both size and
firmness, occasionally occupied the area of destroyed brain, and these
sometimes manifestly exercised pressure that was at once relieved by
their evacuation.
In cases where inflammatory hernia cerebri developed, a secondary
exploration was often indicated for the removal of fragments of bone or
the evacuation of pus, otherwise the condition was best treated by dry
dressings and gentle support.
Abscess of the brain was treated by simple evacuation and drainage by
metal or rubber tubes: the operations were always of extreme simplicity,
since the abscess in every case I saw was in the direct line of the
wound track, and was readily opened by the insertion of a director or
blunt knife. The only trouble in the after treatment was that already
referred to, of preventing premature closure of the drainage opening.
I have made no special reference to the method of dressing, since it was
of the ordinary routine kind. The most important factor in success was
the efficient primary disinfection of the scalp; a piece of antiseptic
gauze and some absorbent wool, efficiently secured, was all that was
needed later.
As usual the consideration of the treatment of cases in which the bullet
was retained may be considered last. Such accidents were distinctly
rare. I operated in only one (No. 54, p. 260) in whom the indications
both for localisation and interference were obvious, since the bullet
had palpably fractured the bone, although it had not retained sufficient
force to enable it to leave the skull. In two other cases that I saw, in
one the bullet was lodged in the zygomatic fossa, in the second just
below the mastoid process. The former patient died; the latter exhibited
symptoms indicative of injury to the occipital lobe (No. 68), and was
successfully treated by Mr. J. E. Ker. I never happened to see a case in
which a retained bullet in the skull was localised by the X rays, but
such might have been possible in case No. 64, p. 275. In no case is
primary interference indicated, unless a fracture exists where the
bullet has tried to escape, or secondary symptoms develop pointing to
irritation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account