Surgical Experiences in South Africa, 1899-1900: Being Mainly a Clinical Study of the Nature and Effects of Injuries Produced by Bullets of Small CalibreMakins, George Henry
History
Surgical Experiences in South Africa, 1899-1900: Being Mainly a Clinical Study of the Nature and Effects of Injuries Produced by Bullets of Small Calibre
Makins, George Henry
Gunshot wounds; South African War, 1899-1902; Surgery, Military
Fractures of the ascending ramus and body were more frequent. They were
accompanied by considerable comminution, but all that I observed healed
remarkably well, and in good position, in spite of the fact that many of
the patients objected to wear any form of splint.
The most special feature was the occurrence of notched fractures,
corresponding to the type wedges described in Chapter V. When these
fractures were at the lower margin of the bone, the buccal cavity
occasionally escaped in spite of considerable comminution, the latter
confining itself to the basal portion of the bone.
When the base of the teeth, or the alveolus, was struck, a wedge was
often broken away, and from the apex of the resulting gap a fracture
extended to the lower margin of the bone.
When fractures of the latter nature resulted from vertically coursing
bullets, much trouble often ensued. I will quote two cases in
illustration:--
(82) Wounded at Rooipoort. _Entry_ (Mauser), through the lower
lip; the bullet struck the base of the right lateral incisor
and canine teeth, knocked out a wedge, and becoming slightly
deflected, cut a vertical groove to the base of the mandible;
_exit_, in left submaxillary triangle. The bullet subsequently
re-entered the chest wall just below the clavicle, and escaped
at the anterior axillary fold. The appearance of these second
wounds suggested only slight setting up of the bullet; the
original impact was no doubt of an oblique or lateral
character.
The injury was followed by free haemorrhage and remarkably
abundant salivation (I was inclined to think that the latter
symptom was particularly well marked in gunshot fractures of
the body of the mandible), and very great swelling of the floor
of the mouth.
The patient could not bear any form of apparatus, but was
assiduous in washing out his mouth, and made a good recovery,
the fragments being in good apposition.
(83) _Entry_ (Mauser), over the right malar eminence; the
bullet carried away all the right upper and lower molars,
fractured the mandible, and was retained in the neck.
A fortnight later an abscess formed in the lower part of the
neck, which was opened (Mr. Pooley), and portions of the mantle
and leaden core, together with numerous fragments of the teeth,
were removed. The bullet had undergone fragmentation on impact,
probably on the last one (teeth of mandible), and still
retained sufficient force to enter the neck.
This case affords an interesting example of transmission of force from
the bullet to the teeth, and bears on the theory of explosive action.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account