Surgical Experiences in South Africa, 1899-1900: Being Mainly a Clinical Study of the Nature and Effects of Injuries Produced by Bullets of Small CalibreMakins, George Henry
History
Surgical Experiences in South Africa, 1899-1900: Being Mainly a Clinical Study of the Nature and Effects of Injuries Produced by Bullets of Small Calibre
Makins, George Henry
Gunshot wounds; South African War, 1899-1902; Surgery, Military
While at work in the Field hospital alone I gained the impression that
the musculo-spiral nerve would not retain the unenviable character of
being the most vulnerable nerve of the upper extremity, since the
chances of each individual nerve seemed about equal, putting the
question of the long course of the musculo-spiral nerve against the
humerus out of question. This expectation was, however, not confirmed,
since the musculo-spiral itself, if not primarily affected, was so often
the seat of secondary mischief in fractures of the humerus. The
posterior interosseous branch seemed to exhibit a similar vulnerability
to slight injuries, to be referred to later under the external popliteal
of the lower extremity. Again, in complex injuries of the brachial
plexus, or nerve trunks, the musculo-spiral branch rarely escaped being
a member, if not individually singled out.
Of the _thoracic nerves_ I have little to say. They must have been often
injured in the thoracic wounds, yet, as far as my experience went,
intercostal neuralgia was uncommon, or at any rate not a special
feature. One observation of interest, however, does exist; in the cases
in which the ribs were fractured by bullets travelling across them
within the thorax, pain was distinctly a prominent feature. This was no
doubt referable to the facts that in such instances the intercostal
nerves were especially liable to direct injury, and that this was often
multiple. On one occasion a crop of herpetic vesicles developed along
the course of a dorsal nerve in an injury implicating a single
intercostal space posteriorly.
_Lumbar plexus._--Although not quite so well arranged to escape bullet
wounds as the thoracic nerves, the lumbar, by reason of their deep
position and the comparatively wide area they cover, together with the
rarity of wounds taking a sufficiently longitudinal direction to cross
the course of more than one or two branches, were also comparatively
rarely damaged. I never saw an uncomplicated case of anterior crural
paralysis, and rarely cruralgia. I think this is to be explained in two
ways: first, that the trunk course of the nerve is short; secondly, that
it lies in the inguinal fossa. The second fact is of importance, since
wounds in this region were in my experience responsible for a
considerable percentage of the deaths on the field or shortly
afterwards. Such deaths probably occurred from internal haemorrhage from
the iliac arteries, and it was in such cases that the anterior crural
nerve stood in greatest danger of injury. I also never saw a case of
localised obturator paralysis. On the other hand, anaesthesia or
hyperaesthesia in the area of distribution of the lumbar nerves in the
groin, the external cutaneous and the long saphenous in the thigh, were
not uncommon. Hyperaesthesia developed in more than one case in which
injury to the psoas had led to haemorrhage into the muscle sheath.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account