Surgical Instruments in Greek and Roman TimesMilne, John Stewart
History
Surgical Instruments in Greek and Roman Times
Milne, John Stewart
Surgery -- History; Surgical instruments and apparatus
Decapitation has now given way before Caesarean section; but the
decapitator, little altered since the days of Celsus, still finds a place
in surgical instrument catalogues.
Paul and Aetius both mention division at the neck, but do not describe a
special instrument. A ring knife for dismembering the foetus has already
been discussed among the cutting instruments; but this seems to be a
different variety with a handle, which it is convenient to discuss in
proximity to the embryo hook. Pl. L, fig. 2 shows a knife on this
principle in the Bibliothèque Nationale.
_Cranioclast._
Greek, πίεστρον, ἐμβρυοθλάστης, θλάστης;
The cranioclast is mentioned by Hippocrates (ii. 701).
Σχίσαντα τὴν κεφαλὴν μαχαιρίῳ ξυμπλάσαι ἵνα μὴ θραύσῃ τῷ πιέστρῳ καὶ
τὰ ὀστέα ἕλκειν τῷ ὀστεουλκῷ.
'Opening the head with a scalpel, break it up with the cranioclast in
such a way as not to splinter it into fragments, and remove the bones
with a bone forceps.'
The nature of the cranioclast is pretty well indicated by this passage,
and in Galen's Lexicon we find πιέστρῳ defined as τῷ ἐμβρυοθλάστῃ
καλουμένῳ. I give drawings from Albucasis of a 'forceps to crush the
child's head' (Pl. LI, fig. 3).
_Cephalotribe._
Whether or not the instrument last described was used also for the
operation of cephalotripsy, or whether there was a special instrument, we
cannot say, but it is certain that the operation of crushing the head and
delivering the child without removing the bones was practised. In Aetius
(IV. iv. 23) cephalotripsy is thus described:
'But if the foetus be doubled on itself and cannot be straightened, if
the head is presenting, break up the bones of it without cutting the
skin. Then to some part of it fix on a traction hook and make
traction, and the legs becoming straightened out we get it away.'
Though there is an essential difference between the operations of
cephalotripsy and cranioclasie there is no essential difference between
the instruments necessary for carrying out the same, and it is possible
that the instrument used may be the same as the last. The cephalotribe
figured by Albucasis is not essentially different from his cranioclast
(see Pl. LI, fig. 4).
_Midwifery Forceps._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account