Sweet Hampstead and Its AssociationsWhite, Caroline A.
History
Sweet Hampstead and Its Associations
White, Caroline A.
Hampstead (London, England) -- History
Few country ladies, unless privileged persons who desired to keep
up their relations with the Court, came to London in those days,
except on urgent occasion. The great trouble and expense the journey
involved, the execrable condition of the roads, and terror of the
highwaymen who infested them, were reasons quite sufficient to
account for the home-staying, which has often been put to their
account as a virtue, and flaunted in the face of their travel-loving
great-great-great-grand-daughters. The principal event in the lives
of many country ladies was the summer visit to one of the fashionable
spas—Bath or Harrogate, Tunbridge or Hampstead Wells—where they met old
friends and renewed acquaintances, picked up the threads of unfinished
family histories, saw dress ‘as worn in the politest circles,’ compared
notes with one another, and acquired the newest information of the world
that lay outside their own, so that on their home-going they became
exemplars and oracles on all social and society matters to those of their
acquaintance who had not had the felicity of visiting the spa.
But to return to Hampstead. The light-hearted indifference to what was
going on around them enabled the fashionable visitors to endure the
scandal of the runaway marriages at Sion Chapel, the hurly-burly of
the four days’ fair, and the company brought together by these doings;
but at last the cheating play at the raffling-shops, and the morals of
Hampstead, became so notorious ‘that persons of character were almost
ashamed to be seen there, even with their own relations,’ and the most
reckless of the rank and file of fashion found it necessary to turn
their backs upon it. Yet, before it reached this last depth of moral
degradation, Hampstead Wells must have exhibited a brilliant epitome
of Bath and Tunbridge. Of course, the behaviour of the company at the
Assembly and Long Room was not lost sight of by the wits and satirists of
the day. The ballad-singers preserved the follies of the Wells in wicked
verse; the playwrights—at least one of them, as we have seen—dramatized
them; and I should not wonder if Baker’s holding of the ‘mirror up to
Nature,’ or the modish pretence of Nature that so often passes for it,
had something to do with the waking up of thoughtful people, and the
falling-off of fashion from the place.
A few people of the upper class, who had learned to love sweet Hampstead
for its own sake, continued, from season to season, to return here for
change of air, so that the better kind of lodging-houses in Pond Street
and elsewhere were not wholly deserted. Neither were the Wells, of which
we have a rather deterrent proof in the following advertisement from the
_Daily Courant_ of June 18, 1718:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account