Systematic Theology (Volume 1 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 1 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
Pascal: “Nature confounds the Pyrrhonist, and Reason confounds the
Dogmatist. We have an incapacity of demonstration, which the
former cannot overcome; we have a conception of truth which the
latter cannot disturb.” “There is no Unbelief! Whoever says.
‘To-morrow,’ ‘The Unknown,’ ‘The Future,’ trusts that Power alone.
Nor dares disown.” Jones, Robert Browning, 314—“We cannot indeed
prove God as the conclusion of a syllogism, for he is the primary
hypothesis of all proof.” Robert Browning, Hohenstiel-Schwangau:
“I know that he is there, as I am here, By the same proof, which
seems no proof at all, It so exceeds familiar forms of proof”;
Paracelsus, 27—“To know Rather consists in opening out a way
Whence the imprisoned splendor may escape Than in effecting
entrance for a light Supposed to be without.” Tennyson, Holy
Grail: “Let visions of the night or day Come as they will, and
many a time they come.... In moments when he feels he cannot die,
And knows himself no vision to himself, Nor the high God a vision,
nor that One Who rose again”; The Ancient Sage, 548—“Thou canst
not prove the Nameless, O my son! Nor canst thou prove the world
thou movest in. Thou canst not prove that thou art body alone, Nor
canst Thou prove that thou art spirit alone, Nor canst thou prove
that thou art both in one. Thou canst not prove that thou art
immortal, no, Nor yet that thou art mortal. Nay, my son, thou
canst not prove that I, who speak with thee, Am not thyself in
converse with thyself. For nothing worthy proving can be proven,
Nor yet disproven: Wherefore be thou wise, Cleave ever to the
sunnier side of doubt, And cling to Faith beyond the forms of
Faith.”
III. Other Supposed Sources of our Idea of God’s Existence.
Our proof that the idea of God’s existence is a rational intuition will
not be complete, until we show that attempts to account in other ways for
the origin of the idea are insufficient, and require as their
presupposition the very intuition which they would supplant or reduce to a
secondary place. We claim that it cannot be derived from any other source
than an original cognitive power of the mind.
1. Not from external revelation,—whether communicated (_a_) through the
Scriptures, or (_b_)through tradition; for, unless man had from another
source a previous knowledge of the existence of a God from whom such a
revelation might come, the revelation itself could have no authority for
him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account