Systematic Theology (Volume 1 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 1 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
Even if man had always existed, however, we should not need to
abandon the argument. We might start, not from beginning of
existence, but from beginning of phenomena. I might see God in the
world, just as I see thought, feeling, will, in my fellow men.
Fullerton, Plain Argument for God: I do not infer you, as cause of
the _existence_ of your body: I recognize you as present and
_working_ through your body. Its changes of gesture and speech
reveal a personality behind them. So I do not need to argue back
to a Being who once _caused_ nature and history; I recognize a
_present_ Being, exercising wisdom and power, by signs such as
reveal personality in man. Nature is itself the Watchmaker
manifesting himself in the very process of making the watch. This
is the meaning of the noble Epilogue to Robert Browning’s Dramatis
Personæ, 252—“That one Face, far from vanish, rather grows, Or
decomposes but to recompose, Become my universe that feels and
knows.” “That Face,” said Mr. Browning to Mrs. Orr, “That Face is
the face of Christ; that is how I feel him.” Nature is an
expression of the mind and will of Christ, as my face is an
expression of my mind and will. But in both cases, behind and
above the face is a personality, of which the face is but the
partial and temporary expression.
Bowne, Philos. Theism, 104, 107—“My fellow beings act _as if_ they
had thought, feeling, and will. So nature looks _as if_ thought,
feeling, and will were behind it. If we deny mind in nature, we
must deny mind in man. If there be no controlling mind in nature,
moreover, there can be none in man, for if the basal power is
blind and necessary, then all that depends upon it is necessitated
also.” LeConte, in Royce’s Conception of God, 44—“There is only
one place in the world where we can get behind physical phenomena,
behind the veil of matter, namely, in our own brain, and we find
there a self, a person. Is it not reasonable that, if we could get
behind the veil of nature, we should find the same, that is, a
Person? But if so, we must conclude, an infinite Person, and
therefore the only complete Personality that exists. Perfect
personality is not only self-conscious, but self-existent. _They_
are only imperfect images, and, as it were, separated fragments,
of the infinite Personality of God.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account