Systematic Theology (Volume 1 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 1 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
Paul Carus, Soul of Man, 52-64, defines soul as “the form of an
organism,” and memory as “the psychical aspect of the preservation
of form in living substance.” This seems to give priority to the
organism rather than to the soul, regardless of the fact that
without soul no organism is conceivable. Clay cannot be the
ancestor of the potter, nor stone the ancestor of the mason, nor
wood the ancestor of the carpenter. W. N. Clarke, Christian
Theology, 99—“The intelligibleness of the universe to us is strong
and ever present evidence that there is an all-pervading rational
Mind, from which the universe received its character.” We must add
to the maxim, “Cogito, ergo sum,” the other maxim, “Intelligo,
ergo Deus est.” Pfleiderer, Philos. Relig., 1:273—“The whole
idealistic philosophy of modern times is in fact only the carrying
out and grounding of the conviction that Nature is ordered by
Spirit and for Spirit, as a subservient means for its eternal
ends; that it is therefore not, as the heathen naturalism thought,
the one and all, the last and highest of things, but has the
Spirit, and the moral Ends over it, as its Lord and Master.” The
consciousness by which things are known precedes the things
themselves, in the order of logic, and therefore cannot be
explained by them or derived from them. See Porter, Human
Intellect, 22, 131, 132. McCosh, Christianity and Positivism,
chap. on Materialism; Divine Government, 71-94; Intuitions,
140-145. Hopkins, Study of Man, 53-56; Morell, Hist. of
Philosophy, 318-334; Hickok, Rational Cosmology, 403; Theol.
Eclectic, 6:555; Appleton, Works, 1:151-154; Calderwood, Moral
Philos., 235; Ulrici, Leib und Seele, 688-725, and synopsis, in
Bap. Quar., July, 1873:380.
3. Mind rather than matter must therefore be regarded as the original and
independent entity, unless it can be scientifically demonstrated that mind
is material in its origin and nature. But all attempts to explain the
psychical from the physical, or the organic from the inorganic, are
acknowledged failures. The most that can be claimed is, that psychical are
always accompanied by physical changes, and that the inorganic is the
basis and support of the organic. Although the precise connection between
the mind and the body is unknown, the fact that the continuity of physical
changes is unbroken in times of psychical activity renders it certain that
mind is not transformed physical force. If the facts of sensation indicate
the dependence of mind upon body, the facts of volition equally indicate
the dependence of body upon mind.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account